[THIN] Re: Terminal services on Win2003 - key differences fro m Win2000
- From: "Monroe, Frank" <Frank.Monroe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 07:04:04 -0400
Unlike per device CALS, per user CALS don't need to store anything in
the registry so the fix won't break PDA's and such.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jim Kenzig Kenzig.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 11:57 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Terminal services on Win2003 - key differences fro m
Win2000
Thats one hotfix we won't be loading. ; ) But I really don't see how
they are going to accomplish this without pissing off a lot of people
who connect using pda's, and other thin client devices (ie older ones)
that can't store a cal.
JK
"Lilley, Brian" wrote:
Microshaft intend to change this (fix it) very soon...
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Landin, Mark
Sent: 06 September 2005 16:51
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Terminal services on Win2003 - key
differences from
Win2000
>When you say per-user CALs are not tracked do you mean although
you may
install 10 there's nothing that will prevent you from having
more than
10 sessions running happily like in the old NT4 TSE days? That
doesn't
sound like Micro$oft !
You are right on all counts. Per-User TS CAL's are not tracked.
Then
again, neither are SQL Server licenses!
Other related posts:
