Does SP1 correct this issue? _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig Kenzig.com Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 11:57 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Terminal services on Win2003 - key differences fro m Win2000 Thats one hotfix we won't be loading. ; ) But I really don't see how they are going to accomplish this without pissing off a lot of people who connect using pda's, and other thin client devices (ie older ones) that can't store a cal. JK "Lilley, Brian" wrote: Microshaft intend to change this (fix it) very soon... -----Original Message----- From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Landin, Mark Sent: 06 September 2005 16:51 To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Terminal services on Win2003 - key differences from Win2000 >When you say per-user CALs are not tracked do you mean although you may install 10 there's nothing that will prevent you from having more than 10 sessions running happily like in the old NT4 TSE days? That doesn't sound like Micro$oft ! You are right on all counts. Per-User TS CAL's are not tracked. Then again, neither are SQL Server licenses!