[THIN] Re: TSE on ESX
- From: Steve Snyder <kwajalein@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:34:08 +0200
yep, x64, both old physical and new VM.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, James Scanlon <
James.Scanlon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> is it a 64bit server?
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Steve Snyder
> *Sent:* 06 April 2011 13:15
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] TSE on ESX
>
> Playing around a bit with w2k8 tse on running as a VM (single Xeon cpu, 8GB
> ram) on ESX4 and while it does seem better than my last experience doing
> this (W2K3 in a VM on ESX 3.0), it is still noticeably slower than the last
> farm I built on physical servers (W2K3 on HP Proliant 385G4 - dual-opteron,
> 4GB ram).
>
> Mainly just noticing that office 2007 apps take several seconds to load
> (like on a PC) while on my last farm the app was loaded and ready in under a
> second - things like that.
>
> Has anyone else noticed this, or care? Is it the reality of the overhead of
> running as a VM, or has W2K8 found to be more sluggish than W2K3?
>
> I'm trying to build a case for thin clients and being able to demonstrate
> noticeably better performance on a TC is a good selling point that I hate to
> not have.
>
> Nope, haven't had a chance to load up with multiple users and see how it
> scales.
>
> *__________________________________**____*
>
>
>
> C. Hoare & Co. is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority with registration no. 122093. The FSA’s address is 25, The North
> Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5HS.
>
> Registered in England no. 240822. Registered office 37 Fleet St, London,
> EC4P 4DQ
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Disclaimer:
>
> This message and attachments are confidential and may be privileged, and
> are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s). If you are not the
> intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this document is
> unauthorised. Information transmitted by email may be intercepted, lost,
> destroyed, corrupted or delayed and as a result, C. Hoare & Co. do not
> accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
> message. If you would like to confirm the contents of this email, please
> request a hard copy version.
>
>
>
> If the contents of this message are of a personal nature, the email will
> have been sent in a personal capacity and not on behalf of C. Hoare & Co.
>
>
>
> Monitoring/Viruses:
>
> C. Hoare & Co. may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with
> current legislation. Although emails are screened for viruses, C. Hoare &
> Co. cannot guarantee that any transmissions will be virus free.
>
> *__**________________________________**__**____*
>
> * *
>
Other related posts:
