The second part of the answer I posted was something I received from another person working another case w/ trend, possibly on a non-Citrix server. I passed it along as a FYI for what the change did. I should have edited out the extraneous info I guess.... Anyway, no, our servers are still running like crap. Seems to mostly impact the older Xeon procs w/ hyperthreading. Our newer dual core boxes don't skip a beat with Trend turned on. The main thing we notice is much higher than normal kernal times in Task Manager. Proquota.exe (we enforce a size limit on roaming profiles) also seems to be at the top of the CPU usage lists, and before the new engine it was hardly noticed. ________________________________ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of erik blom Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 10:36 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Slightly OT - Trend Performance Jay, Any noticeable improvements with this fix? Trend's answer states that no terminal services were installed on your server where the debug logs came from. Is this correct? Have you implemented this fix on your Citrix environment? Regards, Erik 2007/7/10, Jay P. Moock <jmoock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Here's trends explanation of this setting. --- What is system mapped view? System mapped views are the kernel-mode virtual memory space. In general, only the kernel-mode graphics drivers (Win32k.sys) will use the region of system mapped views. Why VSAPI 8.5 uses system mapped view? Because the size of pattern file nowadays is getting bigger and for some memory limited machines, system may not provide enough memory space to operate VSAPI. To utilize memory space better, VSAPI will exploit half(the maximum) free system mapped views in kernel memory and it's by default. Also, a flag in registry was implemented to disable it in case some specific system conditions can not benefit from this extra memory space. Root cause analysis: After analyzed the related debug logs from customer, we summarized the following information we have noticed. 1. There was no Terminal Service been installed. 2. Some of the applications which ran on this system used special account other than "LocalSystem". 3. The non-interactive desktop heap was changed from 512 KB(system default) to 3 MB. According to Microsoft's blog("http://blogs.msdn.com/ntdebugging/archive/2007/01/04/desktop-heap- overview.aspx") and it's also proofed from our internal testing. The system memory consumption scenario will be : 1. The desktop heap allocations will be made from a fixed 48 MB region for system mapped views. 2. Each service which was launched by application and used special account will allocate the individual non-interactive desktop heap. From the desktop heap monitor tool's log, the sum of all desktop heap allocation plus the system mapped views which was allocated by VSAPI was over 48MB. So, it resulted in insufficient non-interactive desktop heap and application failed to continue the allocation. Solutions: We consider the above memory consumption scenario is the special system condition. So, the solution is to disable the usage of system mapped views in VSAPI 8.5 to give all space for desktop heap allocation and it's no any side effect to apply this solution. The disable approach is to add registry value "DisableSystemView" to "1" under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE \System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VSApiNt\Parameters. -----Original Message----- From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jay P. Moock Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 7:33 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Slightly OT - Trend Performance We received the following recommendation from Trend and implemented it on one server so far. No useful stats as of yet. Has anyone else received/tried this? I didn't see anything in their KB about this registry value. --- On your Citrix server where ServerProtect is having issue with the engine, try to add this registry value [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\VsapiNT\Parameters ] Dword: DisableSystemView value: 1 If it is ok, try to reboot the machine after doing this procedure. Then observe the behavior or the performance of SPNT after adding the key. -----Original Message----- From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Erik Blom Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 8:55 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Slightly OT - Trend Performance We are having the exact same issue too, same engine, same ServerProtect version. Made a call to Trend. These are the kind of issues they should be putting in their KB, I think. Looked there, found nothing. SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com ************************************************ For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: //www.freelists.org/list/thin ************************************************ SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com ************************************************ For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: //www.freelists.org/list/thin ************************************************