[THIN] Re: Slightly OT: SQL Redundancy

  • From: "Evan Mann" <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:56:16 -0400


I successfully replicate with it, AND have successfully migrated to a
newer SQL server using it.  I tried to do an automatic failover, but it
didn't work properly because the Double-Take service wasn't running as a
Domain Admin, so it couldn't rename the computers in AD properly.

Aside from that, the database aspect of it was 100% flawless.  It does
bit-by-bit replication of files, so as long as you replicate all your
DBs, master, etc., it will work great.  


From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Joe Shonk
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:55 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Slightly OT: SQL Redundancy



What a success (or failure) has the group encountered in making SQL
servers Highly Available?  Either through clustering (Microsoft or
third-party) or replicated partners.  We are looking to move the Citrix
DataStore and a few application databases to a HA solution, while
minimizing the impact to farm in event an HA partner goes down.



Other related posts: