[THIN] Re: SV: Re: Ctx_SmaUser
- From: "Matthew Shrewsbury" <MShrewsbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:10:18 -0500
Thanks for the tips. Wow what really bites as I didn't know the
isolation environment was limited to Enterprise....I've been pushing it
for that reason. Still one other great reason to upgrade is better
printing system (or at least I hope).
Did you have to change anything on your firewall? I'm thinking I might
have to open the new session reliability port on the firewall.
Thanks for the tips!
Matthew Shrewsbury, MCSE+Internet MCSE 2000 CCA Server+
Senior Network Administrator
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 10:21 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: SV: Re: Ctx_SmaUser
I highly recommend all users also move to the 9.X client, to take full
advantage of the ICA protocol.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Svein Arild Haugum
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 9:17 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] SV: Re: Ctx_SmaUser
Some. (Im upgrading from Win2k SP, MF XPa FR3 SP3 to Win2k PS4a)
1. Since Im using port 80 for Citrix XML and installed the License
senver on the datacollector, I had a conflict with both the license
server console web-page and Citrix XML tried to use port 80. So i had to
change the IIS webpage for the license console to use another port, and
change all shortcuts.
2. For synchron logonscript execution you need to make sure the lokal
program nighborhood client has "pass trough deactivated" for some
reason.
3. Powerusers or the ctx_smauser have at least read/execute on the
root of the systemdrive to autocreate printers.
But the most disappointing thing was that all the cool new features are
mosty on the enterprise edition, nor the memory or cpu performance tools
are avaliable in the advanced edition, also the isolation enviroment are
limited the the enterprise version.
The USB/PDA sync seem to be the only selling point for me to upgrade...
Mvh
Svein Arild
________________________________
Fra: Matthew Shrewsbury [mailto:MShrewsbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sendt: 9. november 2005 14:57
Til: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Emne: [THIN] Re: Ctx_SmaUser
I happen to be planning the same upgrade right now as well. Have you
found any "got yas" in your testing?
Matthew Shrewsbury, MCSE+Internet MCSE 2000 CCA Server+
Senior Network Administrator
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Schneider, Chad M
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 8:46 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Ctx_SmaUser
Make the ctx_sma user a power user.
Done.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Svein Arild Haugum
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 2:14 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Ctx_SmaUser
I am setting up a testenviroment (VMware) for testing the upgrade of my
production farm from XPa til PS4.
In the test enviroment the client printers are not autocreated with the
universal driver unless i add the Ctx_SmaUser to the local
administrators group, or if I add the Ctx_SmaUser to ACL of the
systemdrive with full control.
This article (
http://support.citrix.com/kb/entry.jspa?externalID=CTX107137
<http://support.citrix.com/kb/entry.jspa?externalID=CTX107137> ) states
the following to be a reason print issues can arise:
"Has any file system hardening taken place on the server, for instance,
removal of the local Everyone group?"
Does anyone know the exact filesystem properties this user needs, if you
dont want the Windows 2000 "Everyone Full Control crap"... ??
Mvh
Svein Arild
Other related posts:
