[THIN] Re: SSL

  • From: Bijumon Chacko <bijumon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:36:42 +0530

Hii

The main idea was to reduce hardware..
It seems, we cant install Pres server, WI and CSG on same box..

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Kaftan, John 
  To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 9:30 PM
  Subject: [THIN] Re: SSL


  I have to ask why would what to do this?  CSG is pretty slick.  It doesn't 
cost anything, and all traffic is encrypted with minimal exposure to your LAN.  
Hardware wise you can run it on your WI box and you don't need much in the way 
of resources.

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Andrew Wood
  Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 1:36 AM
  To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [THIN] Re: SSL

   

  Enabling https will secure the traffic to the citrix xml service. Enabling 
SSL relay will secure all traffic to the citrix server

   

  You don't need to setup SSL Relay to enable https for your XML service. Https 
for xml needs IIS to be installed and shared with XML service. Whichever one 
you use you will need a server certificate on each of the citrix servers you 
want to secure, and the root certificate for your private CA installed on each 
of your clients.

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Bijumon Chacko
  Sent: 29 August 2005 15:53
  To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [THIN] SSL

  Hii friends..

   

  Im thinking of setting up SSL (without CSG) using a private CA.

  The HTTPS communication workins fine between WI and client.

  But i am loosing track on secure connectioin to the MF server.

  Should I use HTTPS orCitrix SSL RElay.

  Both cases, do i have to setupSSL relay on MFXP configuration

   

   

  thanx

   

  B

Other related posts: