Not using yet. Beware that while Microsoft treats dual core as a single processor in their licensing count, that does not (necessarily) apply to other vendors, and you need to check with each vendor on what their policy is. I am not even sure if it applies to all Microsoft products or just the OS (does anyone know?). Vendors have a right to charge more money when the customer is getting more value. Lots of ways to cut that (per install, per processor, per user, etc). Some vendors are looking at what Microsoft is doing and playing it in the middle. Oracle, for example, has announced several versions of a scheme where the additional processors cost a fraction of the original. It isn't clear that they have struck a good enough balance to satisfy the market yet, so there may be more volatility in pricing there. tim -----Original Message----- From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adam.Baum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:10 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: SPAM-LOW: [THIN] Single vs dual core Anyone using dual core servers? I'm looking at doing a server refresh this year for Citrix, SQL, web, and a few others. I hear MS treats a dual core as those it was a single processor when it comes to licensing. Seems like this would work wonders for those "per processor" based licenses. If you are using dual cores, how are you using them and what do you think of them? adam ************************************************ For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: //www.freelists.org/list/thin ************************************************ ************************************************ For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: //www.freelists.org/list/thin ************************************************