[THIN] Re: SPAM-LOW: Secure Gateway status ?
- From: "Jeff Pitsch" <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:19:06 -0500
Sorry should have said not the CAG that is used with AAC or how we have
grown to know it.
Jeff
On 2/22/06, Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> CAG enterprise is Netscalar not CAG.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On 2/22/06, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Citrix has already annouced this as the CAG Enterprise Edition.
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > On 2/22/06, Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> > >
> > > talking with citrix people at iForum last year, I would pretty much
> > > guarantee that the Netscalar and CAG products will be combined. There are
> > > many redundant features (specifically VPN capabilities) between them.
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/22/06, Tim Mangan <tmangan@xxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Gosh, at this point we are wondering the same of it's successor,
> > > > the CAG. (Rumor is CAG may merge in with the other appliance Citrix
> > > > bought. Citrix wouldn't confirm this since it might hurt current
> > > > sales).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > tim
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > *On Behalf Of *M
> > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 22, 2006 6:19 PM
> > > > *To:* Thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > *Subject:* SPAM-LOW: [THIN] Secure Gateway status ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone confirm if development of Secure Gateway is to cease ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Other related posts:
