[THIN] Re: [SPAM Score rating "3.000"] Re: Sasser patch

  • From: Kevin Lawson <kevin.lawson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 11:38:28 +0100

Thanks,

It does work on directories.  However it does not propagate down to sub
folders and files, but as w2k only seems to check the folder that does not
matter for us.

Thanks

Kevin Lawson

> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Andrew Rogers
> Sent: 06 May 2004 10:56
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [SPAM Score rating "3.000"] [THIN] Re: Sasser patch
>
>
> The ominously sounding Danger Tools include a "chown" function..
> you could use this to set the ownership via a script, or manually
> if you ne=
> ed to..
>
> http://peter.verhas.com/progs/c/nt/pvt/
>
> i've only used it on a few individual files before, but i suppose
> directori=
> es should work?
>
> Andrew
> --o--
>
> >>> kevin.lawson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 06/05/04 10:50:58 >>>
> One of the things sp4 for w2k does is make a check on the ownership of the
> roaming profile before loading it.  SP4 also includes an addition to group
> policy to allow you to disallow this.  I have installed the
> sasser patch on
> one of our servers (w2k sp3) and this sp4 behaviour is now happening but
> without the item in group policy to disallow it.
>
> The only way I can get round this is by logging in as the user
> onto another
> server and then reclaim the ownership of the profile.  Is there anyway to
> get the group policy check installed or is there a utility or
> command where
> I can reset the ownership of a profile?
>
> Thanks for any advice.
>
> Cheers
>
> Kevin Lawson
>
> ********************************************************
> This Week's Sponsor - RTO Software / TScale
> What's keeping you from getting more from your terminal servers? Did you
> know, in most cases, CPU Utilization IS NOT the single biggest
> constraint to scaling up?! Get this free white paper to understand the
> real constraints & how to overcome them. SAVE MONEY by scaling-up rather
> than buying more servers.
> http://www.rtosoft.com/Enter.asp?ID=3D147=20
> **********************************************************
> Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
> http://thin.net/links.cfm=20
> ***********************************************************
> For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or=20
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
>
> ********************************************************
> This Week's Sponsor - RTO Software / TScale
> What's keeping you from getting more from your terminal servers? Did you
> know, in most cases, CPU Utilization IS NOT the single biggest
> constraint to scaling up?! Get this free white paper to understand the
> real constraints & how to overcome them. SAVE MONEY by scaling-up rather
> than buying more servers.
> http://www.rtosoft.com/Enter.asp?ID=147
> **********************************************************
> Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
> http://thin.net/links.cfm
> ***********************************************************
> For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm

********************************************************
This Week's Sponsor - RTO Software / TScale
What's keeping you from getting more from your terminal servers? Did you
know, in most cases, CPU Utilization IS NOT the single biggest
constraint to scaling up?! Get this free white paper to understand the
real constraints & how to overcome them. SAVE MONEY by scaling-up rather
than buying more servers.
http://www.rtosoft.com/Enter.asp?ID=147
**********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm

Other related posts:

  • » [THIN] Re: [SPAM Score rating "3.000"] Re: Sasser patch