The customer I have using UPM has 25 users spread over the globe on some of the most unreliable Internet connections imaginable. No issues now that SEP has been put under submission. Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com<http://www.carlwebster.com/> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Harry Singh Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 10:18 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: Roaming profile getting corrupt Turning off SEP or real-time a/v scanning seems to be a recurring fix/theme these days. This would have been blasphemy 8-10 years ago. I'm curious to see how Citrix's Profile Management works over slower <2Mbps WAN links. On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gareese@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Logoffsyscheckmodules or something I think. On Nov 1, 2011, at 8:57 PM, Webster <webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > I only have one customer using the Citrix profile solution. They were having > an issue with their profiles until it was determined it was the SEP process > hanging onto files. Once we added the SEP process to the registry key (sorry > never can remember that key's name) that checks for modules at logoff, their > profile issues went away. They do use the streaming option available with > UPM. > > Thanks > > > Carl Webster > Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional > http://www.CarlWebster.com > > ________________________________________ > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > [thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] on behalf of > Harry Singh [hboogz@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:hboogz@xxxxxxxxx>] > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 4:39 PM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [THIN] Re: Roaming profile getting corrupt > > Yup. Roaming Profiles are just awful. Corruption will happen. > > Carl --what can you say about Citrix's Profile Managment solution? I > have yet to test it and haveheard mixed reviews. >