[THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix

  • From: Jeremy Saunders <jeremy.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:30:04 +0800

Also use the SMC Console http://www.citrix4ge.de/ctxsdk/smcc.htm. It will
present you with the latency that each session is experiencing. Very
important information to understand. A Packeteer cannot really adddress WAN
"oversubscription" issues. Force speedscreen latency reduction to on, on
the clients. The initial ICA communications between the client and server
negotiate the best settings. This is not renegotiated during the session.
So if you are using a WAN technology that is not consistent, such as ADSL,
it's very difficult to manage.

Cheers.

 Kind regards,

 Jeremy Saunders
 Senior Technical Specialist

 Infrastructure Technology Services
 (ITS) & Cerulean
 Global Technology Services (GTS)
 IBM Australia
 Level 2, 1060 Hay Street
 West Perth  WA  6005

 Visit us at
 http://www.ibm.com/services/au/its

 P:  +61 8 9261 8412                F:  +61 8 9261 8486
 M:  TBA                            E-mail:
                                    jeremy.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxx










                                                                       
             "Jim Kenzig                                               
             http://ThinHelp.c                                         
             om"                                                        To
             <jkenzig@xxxxxxxx         thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx              
             m>                                                         cc
             Sent by:                                                  
             thin-bounce@freel                                     Subject
             ists.org                  [THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix
                                                                       
                                                                       
             28/06/2006 02:55                                          
             AM                                                        
                                                                       
                                                                       
             Please respond to                                         
                   thin                                                
                                                                       
                                                                       




Here is Cisco's article on autonegotiation and duplex speeds...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk214/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094781.shtml

It is very common to see switches set at Half duplex and server cards set
at full duplex or visa versa and this creates a big bottleneck.
Jim


"Parr, Steve" <> wrote:
 Thanks Jim!

 From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
 Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://ThinHelp.com
 Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:23 PM
 To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: [THIN] Re: Packetshaper and Citrix

 If anything the packetshaper should improve the performance not hinder it.
 If it is network issues I would start looking at portfast settings if
 cisco switches..
 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/12.html And also make sure that
 duplex speeds are properly configured on the server network cards and
 switches.
 Also check out Michaels article on performance issues where he touches on
 the Maxworkitems registry keys..

 
http://www.msterminalservices.org/articles/Fileserving-Terminal-Server-Environments-Part2.html

 JK

 "Parr, Steve" <sparr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 Will be troubleshooting a situation at a company where Packetshaper is
 used including Citrix traffic. Any heads up about the use of Packetshaper
 and Citrix. Apparently they are having some performance issues.


************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************

Other related posts: