[THIN] Re: PVS deployed image - no seamless apps
- From: Saravanan Srinivasan <sarav2k@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 05:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
We were told to reinstall the Edgesight client.
________________________________
From: Erik Blom (telenet) <erik.blom@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 1:15 AM
Subject: [THIN] Re: PVS deployed image - no seamless apps
No, no edgesight client installed. Just out of curiosity, how did you fix that?
Verstuurd vanaf mijn gsm
Op 15-mei-2012 om 22:39 heeft "Saravanan Srinivasan" <sarav2k@xxxxxxxxx> het
volgende geschreven:
Do you have Edgesight client installed?
>
>
>We had some seamless issue with XA 6 HRP01 and Edgesight client.
>
>________________________________
> From: Erik Blom (telenet) <erik.blom@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 1:39 PM
>Subject: [THIN] Re: PVS deployed image - no seamless apps
>
>
>We have re-enabled short name creation and even recreated the image. All short
>names (progra~1, …) are present. Still, the issue persists …
>
>Erik
>
>From:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>Joe Shonk
>Sent: dinsdag 15 mei 2012 19:25
>To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [THIN] Re: PVS deployed image - no seamless apps
>
>We've had issues with the XA tweaks from Citrix. Don't use disable
>8dot3namecreation.
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On May 15, 2012, at 9:43 AM, "Erik Blom (telenet)" <erik.blom@xxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>Hi,
>>
>>We are pulling our hairs out over a strange issue... We recently created and
>>deployed a XenApp 6.5 ‘golden image’ through Provisioning Services (PVS 6.1).
>>The image itself works fine, but once deployed from within PVS, we are not
>>able to launch seamless apps. They do launch, but each application launches
>>within a window of their own. We tried CTX131995
>>(http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX131995) but that did not solve our
>>issue.
>>
>>Can anyone help with this? This is killing our POC.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Erik
>>
>
>
Other related posts:
