[THIN] Re: PSv3 Load Evaluators
- From: "Tim Mangan" <tmangan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:40:02 -0500
Balancing unlike systems. Ex: Quad Proc 3Ghz system versus a Dual 1.4Ghz.
tim
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Stratton, Doug ISMC:EX
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 6:05 PM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] PSv3 Load Evaluators
I noticed that the advanced load evaluator has Upper AND lower values for
some of its rules.
Example:
CPU Utilization 90 full, 10 no load.
Just wondering why you would do the 10 no load instead of just using 0???
Thanks
Other related posts:
