Hi People, I got offered a job by Provision and after a lot of soul seraching, I took it. And believe it or not it wasn't about money. But it was one of the harder decisions I've had to make. Resigning as a CTP was nearly impossible. I really really admire the other CTPs and feel they're about the best bunch of people around. And of course there's always the ego bit. Then there was Citrix. I've been supporting Citrix products since 1993 (Winview) and having the opportunity to actually try and make a difference as a CTP was just incredible. And the Citrix people who encouraged and supported the CTP program have just been terrific, especially Brad Nunn. I hope I was able to help in some of the changes we've seen in Citrix in terms of it's connection with the Citrix user and reseller community, but there was also a lot of frustration. My gut feeling is that Citrix are awfully close to losing the plot from a TS/SBC perspective. There are so many things in the present TS product that could be fixed with just a bit of extra effort that aren't going to be because so much of Citrix' energy is being absorbed into their new acquisitions. Some of the new stuff (Xen, provisioning server etc) is more than cool, once it's properly integrated and ready for serious use. As negative examples, until fairly recently, the whole of Citrix' printer subsystem development was being done solely by Gary Barton. There are the 2 management consoles, the incomplete mfcom apis, non-existent Palm/Blackberry synchronization, USB redirection etc. Of course it'll all going be fixed in the Server 2008 product, maybe, but a lot of the additional functionality will be provided by Microsoft rather than Citrix. Citrix are desperately trying to re-invent themselves, and I still remember Novell doing the same thing 12 years ago. How can you justify losing focus on a product core that's generating more that 3/4s of your income? Of course there's always Platinum edition, but what about the advanced and enterprise customers, what are they getting? Sorry. it's probably not appropriate to be voicing my frustrations like this, but I felt you deserved a decent explanation. I guess I came to realise that my allegience wasn't so much to Citrix but rather you guys (and girls) and the SBC community and technologies. And Citrix has had such a central role. So why did I go to Provision? The "fatal" hook was being offered the opportunity to get involved in really helping to set the direction of the product. Imagine being able to ask for an enhancement and watching it happen. Imagine having a customer or reseller come to you with a requirement for something special and being able to develope and deliver what they need. Imagine putting together an SBC product that will have ALL the bells and whistles. No third party add-ons needed to fix stuff that has been "broken" forever. Provision are far from perfect, their support forums suck, they've been so focussed on R&D and pushing out a good product that a lot of other little things have suffered. But now that Quest is in the mix, we've got the resources to fix things up and maybe make something really special. Some of the stuff coming out in the next few months should really make people sit up and take notice. Anyway, I'm not leaving, just wearing a different logo on my shirt. My heart is still in the same place and I hope I can still contribute something useful. Oh, and I'll try to avoid mentioning that "we can do that" too often ;-) regards, Rick Quest Software Provision networks Division On 3/5/08, Jim Kenzig ThinHelp.com <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Wow good catch Joe... cmon Rick they must of offered you a sweet deal. > Jim > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hey Rick, > > > > Something is not quite right here... For some strange reason, your > > signature come across as Quest Software/Provision Networks Division instead > > of Commodore. Also, I noticed that your name is no longer listed as a CTP > > on the Citrix site... What's the story? > > > > Joe > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Rick Mack <ulrich.mack@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > > > No unfortunately, but a later updated version of mfaphook.dll can be > > > found in hotfix PSE450R01W2K3026 which is also private, but should still > > > be > > > available. > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > Ulrich Mack > > > Quest Software > > > Provision Networks Division > > > > > > > > > On 3/4/08, Steve Greenberg <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone have a copy of PSE450R01W2K3005.msp handy that they > > > > could send? > > > > > > > > > > > > Steve Greenberg > > > > Thin Client Computing > > > > 34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453 > > > > Scottsdale, AZ 85266 > > > > (602) 432-8649 > > > > www.thinclient.net > > > > steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > ************* > > > > > > > > ************************************************ > > > > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or > > > > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: > > > > //www.freelists.org/list/thin > > > > ************************************************ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Jim Kenzig > Microsoft MVP - Terminal Services > http://www.thinhelp.com > Citrix Technology Professional > CEO The Kenzig Group > http://www.kenzig.com > Blog: http://www.techblink.com -- Ulrich Mack www.commander.com