[THIN] Re: PS 4.0 and summary database

  • From: "Beckett, William \(Bill\)" <bill.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:55:51 -0400

Ahh, you're a GR guy uh?


________________________________

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 4:49 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: PS 4.0 and summary database


lol, sorry, I just had to ask especially since HQ for Steelcase is right
in my backyard. :)
 

Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
Provision Networks VIP

Forums not enough?
Get support from the experts at your business
http://jeffpitschconsulting.com <http://jeffpitschconsulting.com/> 



 
On 9/15/06, Beckett, William (Bill) <bill.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 

        Heh, touche'. Actually we're a remote site and the
infrastructure is not that straight forward. My boss is very, uh what's
the word, uh frugal. Yeah that's it 
         

________________________________

        From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf
Of Jeff Pitsch
        Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 4:41 PM
        
        To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [THIN] Re: PS 4.0 and summary database
        

         
        
        I have to ask, you can afford to buy PS Enterprise but you don't
have a SQL Server?  Especially Steelcase of all companies :)
         
        It may very well work but it would not be supported.
         

        Jeff Pitsch
        Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
        Provision Networks VIP

        Forums not enough?
        Get support from the experts at your business
        http://jeffpitschconsulting.com
<http://jeffpitschconsulting.com/>  



         
        On 9/15/06, Beckett, William (Bill) <bill.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote: 

                Would SQL server runtime edition work?
                
                
________________________________

                From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf
Of Andrew Wood
                Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:00 AM
                To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
                Subject: [THIN] Re: PS 4.0 and summary database
                
                 
                 
                yep, summary database on anything...
                 
                needs either MS SQL 7 or 2000 (think they might now
allowed latest SQL release)
                or
                oracle 8i/9i

                 
________________________________

                From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf
Of Beckett, William (Bill)
                Sent: 14 September 2006 13:31
                To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
                Subject: [THIN] PS 4.0 and summary database
                
                 

                Just want to verify this... 

                If no SQL or ORACLE DB is available then you are SOL on
the summary database? PS 4.0 on W2K3, ENT 



Other related posts: