[THIN] Re: Outlook profiles getting mangled
- From: Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:41:31 -0400
I laughed when I saw that. I didn't know there were any reasons to begin
with to use Notes.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Wilson, Christopher
<CMWilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> “Another reason to use Lotus Notes...”
>
> Now there’s something you don’t hear very often.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Steve Snyder
> *Sent:* Monday, August 03, 2009 11:30 PM
>
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Outlook profiles getting mangled
>
>
>
> I think this may be close, I've run it on all of my servers but one server
> is still obstinate and insists on recreating the profile. However, if you go
> into the profiles and set it to use the backup copy (that it just made)
> it'll open fine with that. Another reason to use Lotus Notes...
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jeremy Saunders <
> Jeremy.Saunders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yep…I personally do the following:
>
>
>
> SDT.exe 1 1 1984
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeremy.
>
>
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Steve Snyder
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 04, 2009 12:05 PM
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Outlook profiles getting mangled
>
>
>
> ah - looks like you set the dat *way back*, like Sherman and Mr Peabody. :)
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Steve Snyder <kwajalein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So you just run SDT every night and set it to that day's date then?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Steve Snyder <kwajalein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> absolutely! And it's my most recently built server that's giving me the
> problem.
>
>
>
> Thanks Jeremy - I'll let you know what happens...
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jeremy Saunders <
> Jeremy.Saunders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
>
>
>
> I haven’t seen this for a long time as I think it’s related to the
> Date/Time stamp on the Shadow Keys in the registry. Grab yourself the
> SDT.exe and RDT.exe utils from here
> http://www.brianmadden.com/blogs/brianmadden/archive/2004/09/14/finally-shadow-key-timestamping-utilities-from-microsoft.aspx,
> and run them across all your servers. After EVERY application install, and
> also as a nightly scheduled task, I run this on every server I ever build.
> If you don’t, the time/date stamps will differ across all servers and
> depending on the time/data stamp on the settings in the users profile, their
> settings MAY be overwritten by the newer ones on the server in the Shadow
> Key.
>
>
>
> Does that make sense?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeremy.
>
>
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Steve Snyder
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 04, 2009 11:03 AM
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Outlook profiles getting mangled
>
>
>
> Bizarre issue - office 2006 pro plu, sp2, installed on multiple w2k3 x64
> servers from the same install folder and transform file. Use mandatory
> profiles with FPK 6 along wit a PRF files to establish/maintain profile.
>
>
>
> pretty consistently, but not always, as a user gets logged onto a different
> server than the last one used, Outlook recreates the profile, thus losing
> all of the previous setings. Log back on to another server and it does it
> again. So after a while the Show Profiles show a profile named Exchange, and
> a whole bunch of backups.
>
>
>
> Anyone seen this and any clue why one server's Outlook apprently doesn't
> like another server's Outlook?
>
>
>
> Keys being flexed are:
>
>
>
> HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Proofing Tools
> HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\12.0
> HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\Outlook
> HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\Common
> HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows Messaging
> Subsystem
> ------------------------------
>
> *Confidentiality and Privilege Notice **
> *This document is intended solely for the named addressee. The
> information contained in the pages is confidential and contains legally
> privileged information. If you are not the addressee indicated in this
> message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may
> not copy or deliver this message to anyone, and you should destroy this
> message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Confidentiality and
> legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to
> you.
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Confidentiality and Privilege Notice **
> *This document is intended solely for the named addressee. The
> information contained in the pages is confidential and contains legally
> privileged information. If you are not the addressee indicated in this
> message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may
> not copy or deliver this message to anyone, and you should destroy this
> message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Confidentiality and
> legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to
> you.
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
Other related posts:
