I am surrounded by non-believers! Infidels! :) On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Steve has been preaching for a return to lotus notes longer than he used > notes in the first place. > > personally i think Exchange is plenty flawed but there is not a lot I can > do about it at the moment. someday.... > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I laughed when I saw that. I didn't know there were any reasons to begin >> with to use Notes. >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Wilson, Christopher < >> CMWilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> “Another reason to use Lotus Notes...” >>> >>> Now there’s something you don’t hear very often. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steve Snyder >>> *Sent:* Monday, August 03, 2009 11:30 PM >>> >>> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Outlook profiles getting mangled >>> >>> >>> >>> I think this may be close, I've run it on all of my servers but one >>> server is still obstinate and insists on recreating the profile. However, if >>> you go into the profiles and set it to use the backup copy (that it just >>> made) it'll open fine with that. Another reason to use Lotus Notes... >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jeremy Saunders < >>> Jeremy.Saunders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Yep…I personally do the following: >>> >>> >>> >>> SDT.exe 1 1 1984 >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Jeremy. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steve Snyder >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 04, 2009 12:05 PM >>> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Outlook profiles getting mangled >>> >>> >>> >>> ah - looks like you set the dat *way back*, like Sherman and Mr Peabody. >>> :) >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Steve Snyder <kwajalein@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> So you just run SDT every night and set it to that day's date then? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Steve Snyder <kwajalein@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> absolutely! And it's my most recently built server that's giving me the >>> problem. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks Jeremy - I'll let you know what happens... >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jeremy Saunders < >>> Jeremy.Saunders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Steve, >>> >>> >>> >>> I haven’t seen this for a long time as I think it’s related to the >>> Date/Time stamp on the Shadow Keys in the registry. Grab yourself the >>> SDT.exe and RDT.exe utils from here >>> http://www.brianmadden.com/blogs/brianmadden/archive/2004/09/14/finally-shadow-key-timestamping-utilities-from-microsoft.aspx, >>> and run them across all your servers. After EVERY application install, and >>> also as a nightly scheduled task, I run this on every server I ever build. >>> If you don’t, the time/date stamps will differ across all servers and >>> depending on the time/data stamp on the settings in the users profile, their >>> settings MAY be overwritten by the newer ones on the server in the Shadow >>> Key. >>> >>> >>> >>> Does that make sense? >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Jeremy. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On >>> Behalf Of *Steve Snyder >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 04, 2009 11:03 AM >>> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* [THIN] Outlook profiles getting mangled >>> >>> >>> >>> Bizarre issue - office 2006 pro plu, sp2, installed on multiple w2k3 x64 >>> servers from the same install folder and transform file. Use mandatory >>> profiles with FPK 6 along wit a PRF files to establish/maintain profile. >>> >>> >>> >>> pretty consistently, but not always, as a user gets logged onto a >>> different server than the last one used, Outlook recreates the profile, thus >>> losing all of the previous setings. Log back on to another server and it >>> does it again. So after a while the Show Profiles show a profile named >>> Exchange, and a whole bunch of backups. >>> >>> >>> >>> Anyone seen this and any clue why one server's Outlook apprently doesn't >>> like another server's Outlook? >>> >>> >>> >>> Keys being flexed are: >>> >>> >>> >>> HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Proofing Tools >>> HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\12.0 >>> HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\Outlook >>> HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\Common >>> HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows Messaging >>> Subsystem >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *Confidentiality and Privilege Notice ** >>> *This document is intended solely for the named addressee. The >>> information contained in the pages is confidential and contains legally >>> privileged information. If you are not the addressee indicated in this >>> message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may >>> not copy or deliver this message to anyone, and you should destroy this >>> message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Confidentiality and >>> legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to >>> you. >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *Confidentiality and Privilege Notice ** >>> *This document is intended solely for the named addressee. The >>> information contained in the pages is confidential and contains legally >>> privileged information. If you are not the addressee indicated in this >>> message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may >>> not copy or deliver this message to anyone, and you should destroy this >>> message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Confidentiality and >>> legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to >>> you. >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >> >> >