What would be the reasoning? Patching is an on-going process and would continue long after the drives have been remapped.
Joe
First thing I would do is not remap the drives. :)
Otherwise, I would install all Win2k3 patches first. Then remap, then PS.
Jeff Pitsch Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
Forums not enough? Get support from the experts at your business http://jeffpitschconsulting.com
On 7/31/06, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Remap the drive as soon as humanly possible… That is if you REALLY, > REALLY have a burning need to remap the drives. Otherwise, don't remap the > drives. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *craig batch > *Sent:* Monday, July 31, 2006 3:34 PM > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [THIN] Order of install > > > > What would you guys recommend as an installation order for 2003 with PS > 4.0? If you were going to remap drives for Citrix, would you do this > first or install all OS patches first? > > > ------------------------------ > > See the all-new, redesigned Yahoo.com <http://yahoo.com/>. Check it out.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=40762/*http:/www.yahoo.com/preview> >