[THIN] Re: OT: Win 2K3/DHCP weirdness

  • From: "Matt Kosht" <matt.kosht@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 18:20:34 -0500

I am not 100% sure, but I think it's at least part of it. Also users
with the upgraded driver notice better performance.

On 2/21/06, Michel Roth <mrdizzz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Are U sure the upgrading o the NIC driver was absolutely necessary?
>
>
> On 2/20/06, Matt Kosht <matt.kosht@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> > I was finally able to get this PC to work, but I had to delete the
> > lease for the PC having the issue.  Then I updated the Intel Pro 1000
> > MT driver using the latest rev from Intel (Dell's latest rev was 3
> > years older). Then I excluded the IP from the DHCP range it would try
> > to renew, so it got a new address.  I tested it with many reboots and
> > it worked every time.
> >
> > I have about 12 DHCP servers. No overlapping scopes.
> >
> > The log barks about for just about everyone in the scope...
> > 31,02/16/06,00:14:05,DNS Update Failed, 192.168.244.102,bcsjnd.,2,
> > 30,02/16/06,00:14:05,DNS Update Request,102.244.168.192,bcsjnd.,,
> >
> > But I think this something to do with Dynamic DNS which we currently don't
> use.
> > -Matt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/20/06, Michel Roth <mrdizzz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Matt,
> > >
> > > Just doublechecking:
> > >
> > > You have two DHCP servers ?
> > > They of course have non-overlapping scopes?
> > > C:\WINDOWS\System32\dhcp\DhcpSrvLof*****.log doesn't
> > > help?Michel.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  On 2/17/06, Matt Kosht < matt.kosht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Forcing speed/duplex did not solve the issue.
> > > >
> > > > On 2/17/06, Michel Roth <mrdizzz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > I would go with setting the speed and duplex settings on both the
> PC's
> > > and
> > > > > the switches. In an ideal world, you should always do this for
> optimum
> > > > > performance. I agree however that it's uncommon to have to this just
> to
> > > > > receive a default gateway from your DHCP server.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's your best bet I think.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/17/06, Matt Kosht < matt.kosht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yep so far all have same NIC though different driver releases
> didn't
> > > > > > seem to make a diff. I had a tech tell me that auto negotiation
> can
> > > > > > cause this issue.  I have another tech telling me the Novell
> client
> > > > > > can cause it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2/17/06, Michel Roth < mrdizzz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > All those PC's have that type of NIC?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 2/16/06, Matt Kosht < matt.kosht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I deleted/recreated the scope, restarted server no change.  I
> am
> > > > > > > > starting to suspect this may be nic driver related (Intel Pro
> > > 1000/MT)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 2/16/06, Matt Kosht < matt.kosht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I actually deleted the lease for one of the problem PC's,
> but
> > > still
> > > > > > > > > get the missing gateway with a brand new lease. ipconfig
> > > /release
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > ipconfig /renew  restore the missing gateway.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 2/16/06, Michel Roth <mrdizzz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Make sure that the clients do not renew their lease but
> have
> > > the
> > > > > > > leases
> > > > > > > > > > expire and force them to take up a new lease?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 2/16/06, Matt Kosht < matt.kosht@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I have been having an issue with 2 different DHCP
> servers
> > > that
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > > > hand out an IP address but not hand out the default
> gateway
> > > IP
> > > > > > > address
> > > > > > > > > > > for about 2-3 weeks now.  This is happening only to a
> > > handful of
> > > > > > > PC's.
> > > > > > > > > > > If I release and renew manually it fills in the gateway.
> > > Any
> > > > > > > > > > > ideas/suggestions would be most welcome.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > ************************************************
> > > > > > > > > > > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> > > > > > > > > > > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> > > > > > > > > > > //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > ************************************************
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> ************************************************
> > > > > > > > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> > > > > > > > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> > > > > > > > //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> > > > > > > >
> ************************************************
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > ************************************************
> > > > > > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> > > > > > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> > > > > > //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> > > > > > ************************************************
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > ************************************************
> > > > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> > > > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> > > > //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> > > > ************************************************
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > ************************************************
> > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> > //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> > ************************************************
> >
>
>
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************

Other related posts: