[THIN] Re: OT: Riverbed and Snapmirror
- From: "Roger Riggins" <roger.riggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:00:28 -0600
You can do a tcpdump in the Steelhead and open it with ethereal. For us
it doesn't matter, but for my buddy it screws up ACLs in the routers.
Roger Riggins
Network Administrator
Lutheran Services in Iowa
w: 319.859.3543
c: 319.290.5687
http://www.lsiowa.org
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Steve Greenberg
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 12:28 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: Riverbed and Snapmirror
We have seen the same thing with the Citrix WANscaler product. It turns
out that much of what goes over WAN connections can either be optimized
in terms of TCP windows and sessions, CIFS efficiencies, or, simply
cached at the target end. The carriers must know this, but prefer not
the say anything :-)
I think that WANScaler has one advantage over Riverbed- the traffic is
not encapsulated in a proprietary protocol so that network monitoring
tools, QOS, etc. can still see each individual session and packet.....
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
www.thinclient.net
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jim Kenzig ThinHelp.com
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 10:33 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: Riverbed and Snapmirror
Im still waiting to get one to test. Hopefully soon.. I'll let you all
know.
Jim
On 12/22/06, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How did the Citrix WANScalers hold up?
Joe
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Roger Riggins
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 7:42 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] OT: Riverbed and Snapmirror
FYI
Those of you that use NetApp filers and SnapMirror for replication may
have heard Riverbed's claim to optimize 80% of the traffic. We put in a
couple of eval units and their claim held up. Only about 20% of our
SnapMirror traffic actually traversed the WAN. Our first snap was about
1.5GB and we sent it over a T1 (512 CIR) in under an hour. That's pretty
impressive.
Roger Riggins
Network Administrator
Lutheran Services in Iowa
w: 319.859.3543
c: 319.290.5687
http://www.lsiowa.org <http://www.lsiowa.org/>
Lutheran Services in Iowa Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and may be
legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
return it to the sender immediately and delete the original message and
any copy of it from your computer system. If you have any questions
concerning this message, please contact the sender.
--
Jim Kenzig
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Services
http://www.thinhelp.com
Citrix Technology Professional
Provision Networks VIP
CEO The Kenzig Group
http://www.kenzig.com
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
<b>Lutheran Services in Iowa Confidentiality Notice:</b><br>
<red>The information contained in this communication may be confidential,
is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and
may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its
contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please return it to the sender immediately
and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer
system. If you have any questions concerning this message, please
contact the sender.</red>
Other related posts:
