[THIN] Re: OT: Riverbed and Snapmirror

  • From: "Jim Kenzig ThinHelp.com" <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:32:40 -0500

Im still waiting to get one to test. Hopefully soon.. I'll let you all know.
Jim



On 12/22/06, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 How did the Citrix WANScalers hold up?



Joe


 ------------------------------

*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *Roger Riggins
*Sent:* Friday, December 22, 2006 7:42 AM
*To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [THIN] OT: Riverbed and Snapmirror



FYI



Those of you that use NetApp filers and SnapMirror for replication may
have heard Riverbed's claim to optimize 80% of the traffic. We put in a
couple of eval units and their claim held up. Only about 20% of our
SnapMirror traffic actually traversed the WAN. Our first snap was about
1.5GB and we sent it over a T1 (512 CIR) in under an hour. That's pretty
impressive.



Roger Riggins
Network Administrator
Lutheran Services in Iowa
w: 319.859.3543
c: 319.290.5687
http://www.lsiowa.org







*Lutheran Services in Iowa Confidentiality Notice:*
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and may be
legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return
it to the sender immediately and delete the original message and any copy of
it from your computer system. If you have any questions concerning this
message, please contact the sender.




--
Jim Kenzig
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Services
http://www.thinhelp.com
Citrix Technology Professional
Provision Networks VIP
CEO The Kenzig Group
http://www.kenzig.com
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

Other related posts: