sorry to reply to my own post. IBM is calling it Symphony. http://symphony.lotus.com/ On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I ran NeoOffice at home for about a year or so on a Mac. NeoOffice is a > port of OpenOffice for the Mac. It was ok. I never found myself at a loss > wishing i had MS Office. it had a neat little predictive text feature that > i liked and wished Microsoft had. I never had any issues sharing documents > with MS Office when sending or receiving documents. I eventually ditched it > for iWork for no better reason than I could and I wanted to try it out. > > IBM has also branded Open Office under the IBM logo. Same product but the > perception is an easier sell when it's IBM. Some people still think of open > source as unclean and the realm of hackers and hippies. > > I also agree with the path your taking. I think MS Office has become to > big, too bloated, and too expensive for most users. Sure, there are power > users out there that will need MS Office. But the front line users who are > just typing the occasional memo, letter, or something basic, things like > Open Office, and Google Apps are powerful enough. Server apps like Zimbra > are even worthy alternatives to Exchange. I think exchange is better, but > for the money, Zimbra gets it done well enough for most people. > > Greg > > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Evan Mann <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Has anyone spent any up close and personal time with OpenOffice 2 or 3 >> (now at RC1). I need to seriously look at the product as an alternative >> for basic business users. It has the potential to save up to $10,000 in >> licensing costs. >> >> My basic business user runs e-mail and web based applications, and a lot >> of PDF viewing. Some of them may not even open up any office app aside >> from Outlook more then once or twice in a week. If they open >> Word/Excel/PowerPoint, it's usually to view and print, or generate an >> extremely low end document in terms of complexity. >> >> I have Outlook 2003 licensing through my SBS 2003 R2 Premium licensing, >> and all the desktop licensing is purchased OEM with that equipment, so >> the core needs of the basic business user are covered. I need to >> evaluate, and get real-world feedback on cross-compatibility of Office >> 2003 docs with OpenOffice 2, and Office 2007 docs with OpenOffice 3. >> Focus is on Word and Excel with this compatibility >> >> Power users will still have MS Office suite. I may setup a dedicated >> workstation or VM for the basic business users to have access to MS >> Office suite, should a compatibility issue arises. However, I don't >> want that to be a daily occurance, that needs to be a once a month type >> thing. >> >> >> ************************************************ >> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or >> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: >> //www.freelists.org/list/thin >> NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter! >> http://twitter.com/thinlist >> Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at: >> http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com >> HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed! >> http://thinlist.net/mobile >> Thinlist quick pick >> http://thinlist.net >> ************************************************ >> > >