[THIN] Re: OT Non-Compete Agreement
- From: "Nick Smith" <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:09:33 -0000
. It was probably inserted by a lawyer after some horrible dispute, but
there is *zero* chance of my working for a company which asked me to
sign this.
Nick
_____
From: Eilers, Lee [mailto:lee4@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 14 February 2006 13:06
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT Non-Compete Agreement
Bad mojo!
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Matthew Shrewsbury
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:00 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT Non-Compete Agreement
Waiving your right to trial by jury seems excessive to me.
Matthew Shrewsbury, MCSE+Internet MCSE 2000 CCA Server+
Senior Network Administrator
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:35 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] OT Non-Compete Agreement
THE PARTIES WAIVE THEIR RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY AND EMPLOYEE AGREES TO
PAY [company name deleted] LEGAL EXPENSES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE
EMPLOYEE'S VIOLATION OR THREATENED VIOLATION OF THIS AGREEMENT.
I have been out of the public sector job market for a while and could
use a reality check. I am willing to agree to the employer's need for
protection from competition from former employees. However the clause
quoted above seems a bit excessive.
I'm not looking for legal advice, just some comments on whether this is
a standard contract clause/practice.
Thanks.
Other related posts:
