A software ram disk for NT,2000,XP and 203 exist today. I have seen it set up on a MetaFrame server. The performance was amazing. Check it out at www.superspeed.com. In my experience, disk is a very common (and overlooked) bottleneck. A ram disk (or solid state drive) could help a great deal to overcome this problem. --- Ron Oglesby <roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > God I love these conversations... > > TiGi is still a great Idea. As for a ram disk (in the classical dos > sense) I > don't know if you could do it, since the ram disk is volatile and > the system > might not setup the pagefile right or have problems on a reboot. > BUT a cool > idea. > > Maybe we should bounce some of these ideas off the windows server > group in > Seattle when we head out... Another note on the list. > > Ron > > Ron Oglesby > Senior Technical Architect > Microsoft MVP - Windows Server > > RapidApp, Chicago > Mobile 815 325-7618 > Office 312 372-7188 > e-mail roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > -----Original Message----- > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf > Of Brian Madden > Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 5:08 PM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [THIN] Re: No Pagefile for TS? > > Yeah, I think we've talked about this before... > > The problem is that this would come out of the 2GB kernel space, so > you'd probably end up doing more harm than good. > > The thing to keep in mind is that this whole "no page file" thing > is > something that would only affect a beefy system, and I would think > we > wouldn't want to choke the kernel memory at all. > > But, good point about TiGi, cause they basically offer this without > the > memory hit. > > Brian > > Brian Madden > brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > +1.202.302.3657 > Visit www.brianmadden.com for in-depth Citrix, Terminal Server, and > server-based computing news and analysis, white papers, > downloadable > videos, and product reviews. > > -----Original Message----- > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On > Behalf Of Steve Greenberg > Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 3:47 PM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [THIN] Re: No Pagefile for TS? > > > What about combining the idea of extra RAM and no swapfile by > creating = > =3D > some > sort of RAMDISK and assigning the pagefile to it? Wouldn't this > give you > =3D > a > performance gain while also "feeling right" since we are all =3D > uncomfortable > with eliminating the pagefile since we know that Windows uses it > even = > =3D > when > it is not strictly required. > > I guess this also leading the idea of a solid state drive, i.e. > TIGI, = > =3D > for > pagefile.... > > > Steve Greenberg > Thin Client Computing > 34522 N. Scottsdale Rd. suite D8453 > Scottsdale, AZ 85262 > (602) 432-8649 > (602) 296-0411 fax=3D20 > steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On = > =3D > Behalf > Of Ron Oglesby > Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 10:44 AM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [THIN] Re: No Pagefile for TS? > > > All true 9again this is just an exercise in "is it possible? And if > so > beneficial?" > > I mean if a server has a severe memory leak ot process that is > eating = > =3D > memory > then eventually (4 Gb or 12) you will run out of working set/memory > =3D > anyway. > So if you have a stable system and this an exception (an odd > occurrence > =3D > or > as Tim says something going wacky)and normally run WELL below your > =3D > amount of > physical RAM it would be possible to run without a page file and > see =3D > some > type of performance benefit. (again another "tweak") > > I mean many of us have spent HOURS if not days trying small little > =3D > tweaks to > get a tiny bit more performance, Since all of this little tweaks > are > cumulative. What if something like this could give you a 1-2% > boost =3D > with > very little risk. > > I understand what Tim says (how it doesn't feel right) since > Windows has > always relied heavily on the pagefile even when not needing it. But > we = > =3D > are > working in a brave world here and I think I just might have to > pilot =3D > this > change to see what's what. =3D20 > > Ron Oglesby > Senior Technical Architect > Microsoft MVP - Windows Server > =3D20 > RapidApp, Chicago > Mobile 815 325-7618 > Office 312 372-7188 > e-mail roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx > =3D20 > -----Original Message----- > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On = > =3D > Behalf > Of Bernd Harzog > Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 7:34 AM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [THIN] Re: No Pagefile for TS? > > I have to agree with Tim. There are basically two reasons that the > page > =3D > =3D3D > file gets used heavily in TS environments. One is that applications > = > =3D3D > components get swapped to it (this is the problem that one of the > =3D3D > optimizations in TScale addresses), and the second is that the OS > makes > =3D > =3D3D > sure that there is always enough working set available by > "trimming" = > =3D3D > =3D > pages > in memory that have not been used recently. > > If you run without a page file, you will still benefit from TScale > =3D3D = > =3D > because > you will have cut your total VM available from lets say 12 GB (4 > =3D3D = > GB > === message truncated === ******************************************************** This weeks sponsor Emergent Online. Emergent OnLine is the leading server-based computing consulting integration firm in the nation. Emergent OnLine delivers expert consulting services you can depend on. http://www.go-eol.com ********************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thin.net/links.cfm *********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm