[THIN] Re: Netilla Appliance for Citrix Access - Opinions Nee ded
- From: "Leuci, Chris" <cleuci@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:09:44 -0400
Rob -<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
The SSL based VPN's have too many dependencies on browser configurations and
java, making them a support nightmare. Some of the help desk calls we would
get required us to have users uninstall their personal firewall software,
pop-up blockers, install microsoft jvm, clear temp internet files, change IE
security settings, no local admin rights, etc, etc. We went with Neoteris at
first because of the fact that they claim to need no client software and can
be setup within an hour. Don't buy into it. There is client software if you
want to use it with nfuse or citrix program neighborhood, it's a java
program that proxies the traffic.
Netilla will be easier to set up, but if your looking for a solution with
the least amount of client setup and support, go with CSG for sure.
I couldn't say enough bad things about Neoteris (which is now owned by
Juniper networks)
Also CSG with Web interface is free.
Hope this helps
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Armstrong, Robert [mailto:robert.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:33 PM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Re: Netilla Appliance for Citrix Access - Opinions Nee ded
Steve,
Thank you for the feedback. What, in your opinion makes CSG a better
option? It seems that the complexity of the setup and the licensing costs
of Secure Access Manager make CSG a hard sell compared to the seemingly
simplistic setup and management of the Netilla solution.
I'm just confused about what will be the best solution now and in the future
(with future releases of Presentation Server).
One thing I really need is a solution that will require the least amount of
client setup and support.
Regards,
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Greenberg [mailto:steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:00 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Netilla Appliance for Citrix Access - Opinions Needed
Netilla is a great standalone platform if you are using Terminal Server,
internal Web apps or needs an SSL VPN. However, if you already have Citrix,
Citrix Secure Gateway is a better match.
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd. suite D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
(602) 296-0411 fax
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Armstrong, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 5:22 AM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Netilla Appliance for Citrix Access - Opinions Needed
Greetings,
I'm writing to see if anyone has experience with the Netilla SSL VPN
appliance in accessing Citrix publications from the internet. Please let me
know what your opinions are on this product. Any information will be
greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Robert Armstrong
Manager of Information Technology
Invesmart, Inc.
4550 Lena Drive, Suite 201
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
p: (717) 591-8900 x132
f: (717) 591-9822
e-mail: <mailto:robert.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
robert.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_____
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the
intended recipient, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action
based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by sending a reply
e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
_____
_____
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the
intended recipient, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action
based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by sending a reply
e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
_____
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION - PLEASE READ PRIVACY NOTICE
This communication is confidential and may be read only by its intended
recipient(s). It may contain legally privileged and protected information.
If you believe you have received this communication in error, please "Reply"
to the Sender and so indicate or call (603) 663-2800. Then, please promptly
"Delete" this communication from your computer. This communication, and any
information contained herein, may only be forwarded, printed, disclosed,
copied or disseminated by those specifically authorized to do so.
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE MAY RESULT IN LEGAL LIABILITY FOR THOSE PERSONS
RESPONSIBLE.
Other related posts:
