[THIN] Re: Netilla Appliance for Citrix Access - Opinions Nee ded

  • From: "Armstrong, Robert" <robert.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:45:09 -0400

Ryan,
 
Is WI = NFuse Web Interface?  Sorry for being so slow today :)  Anyway, what
does the architecture without MSAM look like.  Is my below interpretation
close to accurate?
 
INTERNET ---->FW -----> DMZ/CSG ----> NFUSE WEB SERVER ------> FW ----> CFM
Farm
 
Regards,
Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: Lambert, Ryan [mailto:rlambert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:44 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Netilla Appliance for Citrix Access - Opinions Needed



Just as a sidenote...

 

You don't need to purchase MSAM to run CSG. Can use WI.

 


  _____  


From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Armstrong, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:33 PM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Re: Netilla Appliance for Citrix Access - Opinions Needed

 

Steve,

 

Thank you for the feedback.  What, in your opinion makes CSG a better
option?  It seems that the complexity of the setup and the licensing costs
of  Secure Access Manager make CSG a hard sell compared to the seemingly
simplistic setup and management of the Netilla solution.

 

I'm just confused about what will be the best solution now and in the future
(with future releases of Presentation Server).

 

One thing I really need is a solution that will require the least amount of
client setup and support.

 

Regards,

Rob  

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Greenberg [mailto:steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:00 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Netilla Appliance for Citrix Access - Opinions Needed

Netilla is a great standalone platform if you are using Terminal Server,
internal Web apps or needs an SSL VPN. However, if you already have Citrix,
Citrix Secure Gateway is a better match. 

 

Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd. suite D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85262
(602) 432-8649
(602) 296-0411 fax
steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 


  _____  


From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Armstrong, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 5:22 AM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Netilla Appliance for Citrix Access - Opinions Needed

Greetings,

 

I'm writing to see if anyone has experience with the Netilla SSL VPN
appliance in accessing Citrix publications from the internet.  Please let me
know what your opinions are on this product.  Any information will be
greatly appreciated.

 

Regards,

Robert Armstrong
Manager of Information Technology
Invesmart, Inc.
4550 Lena Drive, Suite 201
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
p: (717) 591-8900 x132
f:  (717) 591-9822
e-mail:  <mailto:robert.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
robert.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 


  _____  


This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If you
are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the
intended recipient, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action
based on this message or any information herein.  If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by sending a reply
e-mail and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.


  _____  



  _____  


This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If you
are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the
intended recipient, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action
based on this message or any information herein.  If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by sending a reply
e-mail and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.


  _____  



This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If you 
are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the intended 
recipient, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this 
message or any information herein.  If you have received this message in error, 
please advise the sender immediately by sending a reply e-mail and delete this 
message.  Thank you for your cooperation.

Other related posts: