[THIN] Re: Netflow/Ica sessions Optimization

  • From: "Landin, Mark" <Mark.Landin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:52:11 -0500

Again, Ethereal or other network packet sniffer can help you determine this. 

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
David
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 9:43 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Netflow/Ica sessions Optimization

Philip Walley escribió:
> I concur with Mark on that. If you are using XP, your are still on the 
> bmp printing. Those jobs can become ridiculous in size by the time 
> they spool back on the client.
>
> Do you have DCs on both sides? Replication and network overhead would 
> reduce pipe. You already know that 2/3rds of your line is going to 
> regular concurrent ICA traffic. Any bursting by any protocol could 
> easily consume that remainder.
>
> Are you sure of ICA being 30K? I think 50K is more relative from what 
> I've seen in my captures with a packateer. That difference alone would 
> be the consumption of your line.
>
Yes, I have DCs on both sides and the microsoft traffic is ridiculous.
I said 30k, but I'm not sure. Is there any posibilty to know it? in CMC?

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use 
the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************

Other related posts: