[THIN] Re: NIC teaming and dell servers

  • From: "Nick Smith" <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 08:31:49 -0000

Damon,
If you're getting a blue/gray screen at the console, and you're able to
ping, then it doesn't sound like it's a NIC issue.

I know you've stated that SP1 breaks a 16-bit app, but SP1 was what
sorted out our very similar issues (No Citrix). You may be better served
by working out what it is in SP1 that the 16-bit app doesn't like, and
then applying it.

Do any of the affected servers not run the 16-bit app? If so, I'd
suggest SP1 on one of those and see if the issue recurs.
NIck

-----Original Message-----
From: Damon Edwards [mailto:damonedwards@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 09 February 2006 02:40
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: jpkolenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: NIC teaming and dell servers

I would like to try ALB but the documentation I have states that
Spanning tree must be turned off, it is currently turned on.  I need to
read up on spanning tree t understand why it is on.  

My intel doc states..

ALB teaming requires that the switch not be set up for teaming and that
spanning tree protocol is turned off. 
ALB does not balance non-routed protocols such as NetBEUI and some IPX*
traffic. 
ALB teams can contain both 100 and 1000 Mbps adapters. The load is
balanced according to the adapter's capabilities and bandwidth of the
channel. 
This teaming mode works with any switch. 
ALB mode is not supported for Intel(r) PRO/10GbE Server Adapters. 




---- Evan Mann <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> I'm not familiar with Nortel switches, but if they say the 2 switches
> are 1, then they are probably daisy chained together and act as 1
large
> switch for management purposes, and possible sharing of the total
> bandwidth the switches can handle (via sharing processing load between
> the switch processor).  That's a big guess however. 
> 
> Spanning tree protocol is supposed to be ON in the documentation I
just
> read for SWITCH fault tolerance.  Adapter fault tolerance is entirely
> different.  You originally indicated you are running SFT, not AFT.
> 
> The same documentation I am reading makes no mention of spanning-tree
> for AFT, so it probably doesn't matter if it's on or off.
> 
> ALB (adaptive load balancing) provides fault tolerance and load
> balancing and is the most forgiving. It works with any switch(es), can
> be in same switch or not, so you may want to switch to that mode and
see
> if you get better results.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Damon Edwards [mailto:damonedwards@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 5:46 PM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Evan Mann
> Subject: Re: [THIN] Re: NIC teaming and dell servers
> 
> More specifics
> 
> I attach to 2 Nortel BS-5510-48t switches.  Spanning tree protocol is
> enabled.  
> I do not run SP1  it breaks a 16 bit app I am trying to get rid of but
> am stuck with.
> Servers will ping but I cant connect thru MSTSC or ICA.  
> Reboot is required most of the time, occasionally server will recover
> itself.
> Sometimes get TS service errors stating the service is not responding,
> but the 
>        service is running.
> When I go to the counsel of the server I see a gray or blue blank
> screen.
> 
> Intells documentation states that in order to use Adapter fault
> tolerance Spanning tree must be turned off.  I have argued with the
> network team about which mode to use, they say the 2 switches are
> actually 1 ?????  The only thing I can think of is to break the teams
> and wait for a failure on the primary switch.  Is there a way for me
to
> tell if the team fails over?  I see no entries in the system log but I
> think this is where the issue is.
> 
> 
> ---- Evan Mann <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> > 1850's aren't blades, they are the current generation 1U servers.  
> >  
> > I run adaptive load balance (ALB) all my NIC's and I've never had
any
> > type of teaming problem.   They use Intel Pro 1000/MT's for the
> onboard
> > NICs.  I Download the Intel software right from Intel (10.2 is the 
> > current), so there really isn't much "Dell" when it comes to the
NICs.
> > 
> > Since you're using SFT, are you 100% sure each NIC is into a
separate 
> > switch.  As already stated by another poster, SFT requires each NIC
to
> 
> > be in a separate switch if you want a trouble-free, supported, 
> > configuration.  It also requires certain features to be turned off
on 
> > your switches.  Dell has this documented on their website IIRC.  I 
> > know Intel definately does.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On 
> > Behalf Of Michael Boggan
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 5:16 PM
> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: NIC teaming and dell servers
> > 
> > 
> > Sorry.  Wish I could help.  We had so many problems with our Dell 
> > blades that we just sent them back to Dell.
> > 
> >     ----- Original Message ----- 
> >     From: Damon Edwards <mailto:damonedwards@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
> >     To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> >     Cc: jpkolenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> >     Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 2:44 PM
> >     Subject: [THIN] NIC teaming and dell servers
> > 
> >     I currently run Dell 1850 servers with Windows 2003 / PS3.  I
> have 
> > the 2 internal NICs Teamed in Switch fault tolerant mode.
> >      Yesterday I lost 9 out of 30 servers due to Terminal service
> > failure.  All of them failed within 90 seconds.   Our network team
> > assures me there were no network issues (yea right).  Has anyone
seen 
> > issues with this mode of network card teaming?
> >     ************************************************
> >     For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
> >     set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> >     //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> >     ************************************************
> >     
> >
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> ************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************


************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************

Other related posts: