[THIN] Re: Microsoft's Windows Server chief on Linux, 64-bit computing
- From: "ThinFan ." <thinfan1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 07:09:22 -0700
What if:
Web Interface and CSG used Session Cookies to contain and pass the UserID
and Password, so that systems like Oblix, SiteMinder, RSA, Safeword,
Etc.Etc.. could be used for Enterprise Authentication/Authorization into
Citrix as well?
We essentially have SSO to everything BUT Web Interface/CSG. We go as far
as reading and inserting your UserID into the Web Interface UserID Screen,
and then Grey it out and lock the user into the password field. BUT, the
user will always have to type their password again, even if they've done it
at a previous Token Authorization Screen or other portal site at the
Company.
ThinFan
>From: "Jim Kenzig http://thin.net"; <jimkenz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [THIN] Re: Microsoft's Windows Server chief on Linux, 64-bit
>computing
>Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 21:14:44 -0400
>
>Yeah I am just trying to stir up trouble (wink) We all know that the
>lab is quite different than the real world.
>
>By the way, I am headed to Florida for the Citrix Customer Forum on
>Wednesday. This is where they take about 15 of their top customers and
>deluge them with what ifs and how much would you pay for type questions.
>
>If anyone has any big issues they wan't brought up to Citrix (and I'll
>be sure to try and get it to the people that matter) let me know by end
>of Tuesday.
>Jim
>
>
>Steve Greenberg wrote:
>
> > Jim,=20
> >
> > But you left out the next Q&A:
> >
> > Has Microsoft tested it internally?=20
> > We've tried it internally, and it's substantive.=20
> >
> > Steve Greenberg
> > Thin Client Computing
> > 34522 N. Scottsdale Rd. suite D8453
> > Scottsdale, AZ 85262
> > (602) 432-8649
> > (602) 296-0411 fax=20
> > steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On =
> > Behalf
> > Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.net
> > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 1:24 PM
> > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: Microsoft's Windows Server chief on Linux, 64-bit
> > computing
> >
> >
> > That link gets cludged...
> > Here is the key paragraph on
> >
>http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/windows/story/0,10801,9321=
> > 3p4
> > ,00.html
> >
> > Bob Muglia Microsoft Windows Chief said:
> > "The interesting thing is some of these scenarios are memory-constrained
>=
> >
> > by the kernel and how much space it needs to take and use. So just by=20
> > having the kernel go 64-bit, you get a capacity improvement. Let me give
>=
> >
> > you an example of a service that just benefits phenomenally with
>32-bit=20
> > applications running in a 64-bit world. Terminal Server today on
>these=20
> > new four-way and certainly eight-way systems is completely
>constrained=20
> > by the amount of memory that can be used, because each user session uses
>=
> >
> > a fair amount of memory. Each of them is like a client. So in a Terminal
>=
> >
> > Server world, by going to the 64-bit operating system, even though=20
> > Office and the apps that are being run are only 32-bit, you can get a=20
> > lot more of those on simultaneously. All of a sudden, we explode the=20
> > number of simultaneous users that a server can support. "
> >
> > AND then
> > Q. Do you know any customers who have tried it?
> > A. "Too early."
> >
> > This doesn't sound to me like they have done a whole lot of testing with
>=
> >
> > this theory to support those claims.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
> >
> > Steve Greenberg wrote:
> >
> >>Microsoft 64 bit chief states that 64 bit Terminal services works in=20
> >>the =3D lab with 32 bit apps:
> >>=20
> >>=20
> >>http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/windows/story/0,10801,9
> >>321=3D
> >>3,0
> >>0.html
> >>=20
> >>Steve Greenberg
> >>Thin Client Computing
> >>34522 N. Scottsdale Rd. suite D8453
> >>Scottsdale, AZ 85262
> >>(602) 432-8649
> >>(602) 296-0411 fax=3D20
> >>steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>=20
> >>=20
> >>=20
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On=20
> >>=3D Behalf Of Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data Corporation
> >>Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 9:03 AM
> >>To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: [THIN] Re: CSG ports
> >>=20
> >
>********************************************************
>This Week's Sponsor - Tarantella Secure Global Desktop
>Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Terminal Server Edition
>Free Terminal Service Edition software with 2 years maintenance.
>http://www.tarantella.com/ttba
>**********************************************************
>Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
>http://thin.net/links.cfm
>***********************************************************
>For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
>set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
>http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
_________________________________________________________________
Stop worrying about overloading your inbox - get MSN Hotmail Extra Storage!
http://join.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/
********************************************************
This Week's Sponsor - Tarantella Secure Global Desktop
Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Terminal Server Edition
Free Terminal Service Edition software with 2 years maintenance.
http://www.tarantella.com/ttba
**********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
Other related posts:
