[THIN] Re: MPS 3.0 licensing issue

  • From: Jonathan Kadoo <jkadoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:53:45 -0400 (EDT)

thanks for the responses.  I didn't know about this article.  I was thinking 
that 96 hours was a little short sighted!!!!!

Jeff Pitsch <jpitsch@xxxxxxx> wrote:If the license server goes down, you now 
have 30 days to bring it back
online. See this article:

Jeff Pitsch

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Kadoo
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 3:29 PM
To: Thinlist
Subject: [THIN] MPS 3.0 licensing issue

I am working on an issue with our upgrade to mps 3.0. We have two
offices with a dedicated link between them. We are debating on how to
setup our licensing. What we want to accomplish is to have our licenses
shared between both offices. So if one office goes down the other will
still have the use of all the licenses. 

I have been doing a lot of reading about how the new licensing works and
I don't really see a way of accomplishing this. The only options I can
see is to have one server in one office and have everyone in both
offices share the licenses from that server. Or have two servers one in
each office and split our total licenses between both offices. Am I
missing something here? Is there no way we can share the licenses
without having just one server in one office?


This Weeks Sponsor triCerat:
Have you had your fill of printing support calls, unauthorized apps running on 
unsecured Terminal Servers, profile headaches, and application performance 
problems? Join us and learn how you can have a less demanding on-demand 
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:

Other related posts: