[THIN] Re: Loopback

  • From: Bill Beckett <Bill.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:33:36 -0500

Ahhh, that just answered my Win98 question. Thanks Ron.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Oglesby [mailto:roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday December 01, 2004 11:31 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Loopback

One thing in that sentence. "the client" is not the Citrix/TS client, it is
the Terminal server. 


Ron Oglesby

Senior Technical Architect

Microsoft MVP, Windows Server 


RapidApp, Chicago

Office 312.372.7188

Mobile 815.325.7618

email roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:roglesby@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 


-----Original Message-----
From: Lilley, Brian [mailto:brian.lilley@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:27 AM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Re: Loopback



-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf
Of Bill Beckett
Sent: 01 December 2004 16:20
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Loopback

Just want to hear from the list and make sure that I am understanding this
correctly. With loopback processing, say on a Terminal Server, the user
policy inherited from the domain can be over-ridden by the policies of that
on the Terminal server box. However, it does not work if the user account is
in an NT domain OR if the client is not a Windows 2000 client??? Is that

This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received
this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was
misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB
retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its network.
Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB until they
are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be secure.

Other related posts: