[THIN] Re: KB: Deploying Citrix MetaFrame on IBM eServer BladeCenter
- From: Jeremy Saunders <jeremy.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 06:51:08 +0800
No no no...you guys are looking at it the wrong way. They are not about to
release a how to for using a HDS or EMC on the backend, are they? IBM are
not going to fud someone to write a Red Book on someone elses hardware.
It's just simply a "how to" document. Nothing more...nothing less. Whilst
the concepts can still be applied, I think it's outdated and does not
represent the way my team would deploy Citrix servers, blades or no blades.
Kind regards,
Jeremy Saunders
Senior Technical Specialist
Integrated Technology Services &
Cerulean
IBM Australia
Level 2, 1060 Hay Street
West Perth WA 6005
Visit us at
http://www.ibm.com/services/au/its
P:Â +61 8 9261 8412 F:Â +61 8 9261 8486
M:Â TBA E-mail:
jeremy.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Roger Riggins"
<roger.riggins@ls
iowa.org> To
Sent by: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
thin-bounce@freel cc
ists.org
Subject
[THIN] Re: KB: Deploying Citrix
24/01/2006 01:41 MetaFrame on IBM eServer
AM BladeCenter
Please respond to
thin
Thatâs what I think. I didnât read the whole thing, but it looked like they
labeled it as though it would house SQL, profiles, and home folders. They
wouldnât be local anyway, so it was a good spot for another sales plug
rather than generic storage.
Roger Riggins
Network Administrator
Lutheran Services in Iowa
w: 319.859.3543
c: 319.290.5687
http://www.lsiowa.org
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Landin, Mark
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:17 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: KB: Deploying Citrix MetaFrame on IBM eServer
BladeCenter
Or maybe IBM just wants to market their storage.
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Joe Shonk
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:06 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: KB: Deploying Citrix MetaFrame on IBM eServer
BladeCenter
Interestingâ. IBM wants to backend the Citrix Servers to their
storage boxâ I wonder if this is because the onboard SCSI Raid
controller is so freakân slow..
Joe
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://ThinHelp.com
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 7:57 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] KB: Deploying Citrix MetaFrame on IBM eServer
BladeCenter
This is a PDF file:
http://support.citrix.com/servlet/KbServlet/download/2870-102-14414/18392.pdf
Original Citrix KB article is at:
http://support.citrix.com/kb/entry.jspa?entryID=2870
Jim Kenzig
CEO The Kenzig Group
http://www.kenzig.com
Sponsorships Available!
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Terminal Services Downloads: http://www.thinhelp.com
Windows Vista: http://www.VistaPop.com
Virtualization: http://www.virtualize-it.com
Games: http://www.stressedpuppy.com
Lutheran Services in Iowa Confidentiality Notice
==================================================================
The information contained in this communication may be confidential,
is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above, and
may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its
contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please return it to the sender immediately
and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer
system. If you have any questions concerning this message, please
contact the sender.
ŠÀÈb½ëI+hR{.nÇ+‰·’¹» ®&Þ» ´8 zËhVœjØžj zë ¶›zZ0–)ä†Ûiÿü0ÁúÞzX¬¶Ê+ƒùb²ßí†)
Other related posts:
