[THIN] Re: HELP! Published App Issue
- From: "Jason Patten" <JasonP@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:52:25 -0500
We aren't using IMS. And this may complicate things. We actually have 2 farms
on this subnet. This is happening with one of the farms. It is a bit of a
unique situation, but all 200+ apps are running on a single server. However we
do not have more than 25-30 people ever on at a time so its not a serverload
issue. The reason we have so many is that while it is actually only about 10
different programs, each customer requires a separate install of the
application to keep data separated between customers. So Application-A will
have a separate install for all 20 customers, resulting in 20 published apps.
After a while this adds up.
Jason
Jason Patten
M3 Tech support
Ph.(770) 297 1925 x266
Email: jason@xxxxxxxx
YahooID: jasonrpatten
670,616,629 mph. Its not just a good idea, its the law.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Rick Mack
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 3:38 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [THIN] Re: HELP! Published App Issue
Hi Jason,
Nope. Probably just a problem we'd prefer to forget.
Had a customer running 350+ published apps on NT 4.0/ MF 1.8 and things were
just starting to break. We had the luxury of being able to split their farm in
half and things stabilized.
However we have another customer with 250+ published apps and no IMS where
things are still working fine.
IMS just compounds the problem because PN is used by IMS as well. So if you
have 150 IMS packages, that just adds to the PN load.
In 1.8 PN is handled on a per-server basis with each server maintaining it's
own, sometimes incomplete published application list. Published app information
was stored in each server's registry and things could get really interesting at
times.
If the ICA client connects to a server that is a bit sick, it won't get a
complete list of published apps and you'll get PN icons disappearing etc.
XP/MPS with PNAgent is much better, both from an architecture and stability
viewpoint. But if you're still running 1.8, then the cost of the upgrade is
probably an issue.
regards,
Rick
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Jason Patten
Sent: Thu 4/11/2004 5:35 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: citrixse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: HELP! Published App Issue
Hmmm I must have stunned everyone. I'm sure I remember seeing this issue. I
have not had any luck finding this in Citrix knowledgebase yet or Thin Archives.
Jason
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Jason Patten
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 10:53 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] HELP! Published App Issue
Does anyone remember the maximum number of Published apps that can be handled
by a MF1.8 Farm. We have a farm that is running well over 100 apps now (I
don’t have the exact count) and suddenly we have applications that are
completely vanishing from the Published App manager. I seem to recall an issue
with this and the number of applications, but cannot find it in the archives or
what the solution is.
Jason
Jason Patten
M3 Tech support
Ph.(770) 297 1925 x266
Email: jason@xxxxxxxx
YahooID: jasonrpatten
670,616,629 mph. Its not just a good idea, its the law.
--
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.280 / Virus Database: 264.12.7 - Release Date: 11/1/2004
#####################################################################################
This e-mail, including all attachments, may be confidential or privileged.
Confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost because this e-mail has been
sent to you in error. If you are not the intended recipient any use, disclosure
or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error
please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of
this e-mail and any attachments. All liability for direct and indirect loss
arising from this e-mail and any attachments is hereby disclaimed to the extent
permitted by law.
#####################################################################################
--
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.280 / Virus Database: 264.12.7 - Release Date: 11/1/2004
--
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.280 / Virus Database: 264.12.7 - Release Date: 11/1/2004
Other related posts:
