[THIN] Re: FW: Re: secure gateway
- From: Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:25:39 +1200
no big deal. I finally got it working. The firewall needed one more tweak
and then we fought a couple of name resolution issues but now it is working
great.
Greg
On 2/10/06, Matthew Shrewsbury <MShrewsbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ops never mind, I see you are talking about the "Secure Gateway". Sorry!
>
>
>
> *Matthew Shrewsbury, *MCSE+Internet MCSE 2000 CCA Server+
>
> Senior Network Administrator
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Matthew Shrewsbury
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 09, 2006 9:01 AM
>
> *To:* 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> *Subject:* RE: [THIN] Re: secure gateway
>
>
>
> I don't know if it applies in your case but you have to have WI4.2 if you
> are using AG 4.0. Citrix said WI4.0 won't work with AG4.0.
>
>
>
> *Matthew Shrewsbury, *MCSE+Internet MCSE 2000 CCA Server+
>
> Senior Network Administrator
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Greg Reese
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 08, 2006 5:00 PM
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: secure gateway
>
>
>
> i found the error 40. i had a typo in the WI config. fixed that and I am
> now troubleshooting
>
> SSL Error 5: An unclassifiesd SSL Error Ocurred (0x80090308 - the token
> supplied to the function is invalid)
>
> I just started at the Citrix website to track that down.
>
> At least I am getting closer.
>
> Greg
>
> On 2/9/06, *Jeff Pitsch* <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I believe (off the top of my head) that 40 is FQDN's cannot be resolved
> properly. Or it might be cert name is wrong as well.
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> On 2/8/06, *Greg Reese* <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> got it running a little better. It is at least now trying to use the
> gateway. Now I am seeing the SSL error 40.
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> On 2/8/06, *Greg Reese* < gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> nope. it looks like any other ICA connection from the connection center.
> oh well. At least I got something on my first attempt. time for take two.
>
>
>
> On 2/8/06, *Jeff Pitsch* <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You should see sessions in the SG management console. Something is
> definately wrong with your setup. Your connectioin center should also say
> SSL/TLS connection (or something similar).
>
>
>
> Jeff Pitsch
>
>
>
> On 2/7/06, *Greg Reese* <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This seems like a dumb question but I figured I would throw it out there
> anyway.
>
> I installed a secure gateway server and got it up and running the lan. I
> installed WI4 on the same machine. I can connect to the WI site, the secure
> gateway performance statistics show some traffic flowing. I see Connections
> Total, HTTP/S Bytes to client etc.
>
> But the active sessions are zero while I am running an app and when I look
> at the launch.ica file from my client, i see the ip address of the server
> my ICA session goes to.
>
> Is that what i am supposed to be seeing? I thought the location of the
> metaframe servers was hidden with Secure Gateway.
>
> How can I tell this thing is working right. I would like to know i have
> things correct before dropping it in my dmz.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
