[THIN] Re: FW: Re: Performance of Citrix vs RDP for images
- From: "Michel Roth" <mrdizzz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:56:58 +0200
Yes, it's the Provision Networks client (appportal).
(sorry for butting in Rick ;-) )
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Steve Greenberg <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Rick,
>
>
>
> Do you install a different RDP client package to use these additional
> features?
>
>
>
>
>
> *Steve Greenberg*
>
> Thin Client Computing
>
> 34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453
>
> Scottsdale, AZ 85266
>
> *(602) 432-8649*
>
> www.thinclient.net
>
> *steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx*
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Rick Mack
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:48 PM
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: FW: Re: Performance of Citrix vs RDP for images
>
>
>
> Hi Guys,
>
>
>
> Provision Networks have just finished the first part of their multimedia
> redirection enhancements to RDP. Check out the difference between standard
> RDP and Provission's enhanced RDP:
>
>
>
>
> http://blogs.inside.quest.com/provision/2008/06/07/multimedia-redirection-for-vdi-and-terminal-services/
>
>
>
> We've got local text echo and multimedia support right now, and will
> shortly have buffering for multimedia on slower links and flash redirection.
> Next comes progressive display and opengl support and the whole ICA vs RDP
> story will be irrelevant, at least it will be if you use the Provision RDP
> engine..
>
>
>
> Not too bad really :-)
>
>
>
>
>
> TS08 isn't much faster and won't be until the Callista technology gets
> incorporated.
>
>
>
> regards,
>
>
>
> Rick
>
>
> --
> Ulrich Mack
> Quest Software
> Provision Networks Division
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Nick Smith <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Anyone know if W2K8 performs better?
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Kind Regards,
Michel Roth
Thincomputing.net
Other related posts:
