[THIN] Re: FQDN's in ICA instead of IP's
- From: "Brian Politis" <bpolitis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:31:16 -0400
We use and like them. Much easier if your servers move, no reason to
update multiple entries. Just change your DNS and everything runs
great. As long as DNS is reliable this is a better way to go in my
opinion.
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Bill.Ramby@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:24 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] FQDN's in ICA instead of IP's
I have a client that wants to use FQDN's in hi ICA file rather than the
standard IP addresses. The only real argument I have against it is that
if his DNS ever goes awry, he won't be able to connect. Any other
reasons FQDN's aren't a good idea in an ICA file?
===================================
This weeks Sponsor:
ThinPrint
- High resolution, DRIVER FREE PRINTING with no loss of quality in
color.
- Removes print spooling and rendering tasks from your terminal server.
http://www.thinprint.com ===================================
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link.
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
===================================
This weeks Sponsor:
ThinPrint
- High resolution, DRIVER FREE PRINTING with no loss of quality in color.
- Removes print spooling and rendering tasks from your terminal server.
http://www.thinprint.com
===================================
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link.
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
Other related posts:
