And? What is it? On 6/6/08 2:48 PM, "Steve Greenberg" <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Oh crap, I just realized what the real killer app is for VDI?? > > Dana Carvey nailed it at SYNERGY, seemed like a joke but I think it is right > on the money ! > > > > Steve Greenberg > > Thin Client Computing > > 34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453 > > Scottsdale, AZ 85266 > > (602) 432-8649 > > www.thinclient.net <www.thinclient.net> > > steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > Of Douglas Brown > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 10:32 AM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [THIN] Re: Doug Brown thinks Citrix is the "Madonna" ofVirtualization > > I agree but only if they don¹t burry it in XenApp Plat or XenDesktop Plat. It > needs to be a separate product for people who might not want to use either > XenApp or XenDesktop.... > > > > > On 6/6/08 9:58 AM, "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Why also discuss PVS and if it should be part of XenApp Platinum ( I¹m willing > to give up Edgesight and Password Manager in exchange) and should Citrix fix > their products or spend their money adding new features. > > > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > Of Jim Kenzig > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 4:52 AM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [THIN] Re: Doug Brown thinks Citrix is the "Madonna" ofVirtualization > > > Speaking of Joe this is one of my favorite picturess I took from Synergy This > is during Dougs Geek Speak session and is a picture of the front row. > > http://picasaweb.google.com/jkenzig/CitrixGeekSpeakCTP/photo#52032010390493145 > 46 > > > > From left to right Joe is the one Hovering standing next to Brad Stephens, who > is Next to Mark Templeton who is next to Shawn Bass (who had just finished his > VDI talk) Barry Flanagan, Jeroen Van De Kamp and Brian Madden are in there > also. Now use the right arrow and click over 2 pictures and see how fast > Brian catches Marks ear. Click 2 more to the right and there is Grumpy Doug. > And here is one of Steve, Joe and Doug picking apart VDI at the CTP dinner > http://picasaweb.google.com/jkenzig/CitrixGeekSpeakCTP/photo#52032011764882682 > 90 > > > > > > Jim > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Steve Greenberg <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is a long standing debate between Joe and I . To me VDI, and most > hypervisor virtualizations for that matter, are just not efficient enough. For > applications that require remoting and certain kinds of processing I am sure > there is a good match, i.e. stock traders, CAD engineers working at a > distance, etc. > > The case we are pondering more and more is where remoting is needed but the > requirements to get the application set working in TS are highly complicated. > These may not be highly specialized apps, but apps that just don't play well > in TS. We have made some incredibly difficult apps work together on TS, but in > the end you have a very complicated system that is hard to upgrade and change. > So for certain organizations that have the skills to manage a PC but not a > complex TS environment, VDI starts to become attractive. > > > One of our Bri-Forum sessions is called "Y-VDI" in which we will outline all > the use cases we can think of that support VDI. > > My main issues with VDI are lack of efficiency, i.e. a really big ass server > might support 15-20 users, that completely sucks!! >