[THIN] Re: DST Patch and Citrix
- From: Jeremy Saunders <jeremy.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:32:05 +0900
Here's the rundown on what it contains...http://www.sbslinks.com/DST.htm
posted to a patch management list I am on by an Edward Ziots (EZiots at
Lifespan.org).
Cheers.
Kind regards,
Jeremy Saunders
Senior Technical Specialist
Infrastructure Technology Services
(ITS) & Cerulean
Global Technology Services (GTS)
IBM Australia
Level 1, 1060 Hay Street
West Perth WA 6005
Postal: PO Box 525, West Perth WA
6872
Visit us at
http://www.ibm.com/services/au/its
P: +61 8 9261 8412 F: +61 8 9261 8486
P: (Reception) +61 8 9261 8420 E-mail:
M: TBA jeremy.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxx
Evan Mann
<emann@pinnaclefi
nancial.com> To
Sent by: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
thin-bounce@freel cc
ists.org
Subject
[THIN] Re: DST Patch and Citrix
10/02/2007 07:30
AM
Please respond to
thin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
g
The versions on KB articles is usually misleading. It does not indicate
revisions to the hotfix itself alone, but the revision level increments
when the details on the hotfix itself change, just like Citrix patches.
The difference is, at least Citrix tells you what was changed at each
revision so you know if the installer was changed. I haven't seen this
type of information from MS, but maybe I don't know where to look.
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Malcolm Bruton
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 4:38 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: DST Patch and Citrix
What’s in the patch is different to the registry edits. My guess is the
patch brings all time zone information up to date rather than just a few.
My guess is it’s a back port from Vista or the like yet the article remains
a bit lacking. I’m sure what Microsoft has supplied in the article is
enough to fix the US problem. Just isn’t the complete job like the patches
for all those updated zone.
By the way I heard that they updated the 2003 patch today but I haven’t
seen the updated download yet. Also did anyone notice that
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/928388 is up to version 11.0
Malcolm
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of brandon.mitchell@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 09 February 2007 20:19
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: DST Patch and Citrix
See KB914387 "How to configure daylight saving time for the United States
in 2007"
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/914387/en-us
Microsoft basically gives you the correct registry entries and a script to
implement on Windows 2000. This is everything you need short of a official
patch.
Brandon
Bob <bobmails@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx cc:
Subject: [THIN] Re: DST
Patch and Citrix
02/09/2007 03:09 PM
Please respond to thin
It's not difficult to package yourself, or you could get a pre-package
here:
http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2007/01/unofficial-windows-2000-daylight.html
On 2/9/07, Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55 <hector.minero@xxxxxxxx >
wrote:
On the same topic, I checked the MS site and there is no DST patch for
Windows 2000, unless you have Extended hotfix support.
What are you doing to patch Windows 2000?
_________________________
Hector Minero
NSWCDD Code K55
Ph: 540.653.8859
Email: hector.minero@xxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Anthony_Baldwin@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 4:19 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: DST Patch and Citrix
Chris,
This article mentions how to work around the PS 3.0 java 1.4.1_XX
dependency...
http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX106292&searchID=38652551
Tony
<christopher.walter@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
02/08/2007 04:06 PM
To
<thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Please respond to Subject
thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [THIN] DST Patch and
Citrix
Hi All,
I haven't had much time to investigate so I am hoping to check with others.
I am using Presentation Server 3.0. When you install Metaframe it required
1.4.1_02. The DST patch apparently is only supported with JRE 1.4.1_11.
Citrix's website says that Citrix is fully compatible with the patch, does
that mean that Java does or doesn't need to be upgraded? If anybody has
tested this out yet can you let me know.
Thanks,
Chris
Other related posts:
