[THIN] Re: DST Patch and Citrix
- From: Michael Pardee <pardeemp.list@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:08:34 -0500
I believe you can use the latest tzedit.exe from Microsoft, which probably
just updates the registry with the new time zone info, so we are looking to
push those changes out to Wind2k and XP SP1 boxes that might still be out
there.
From: "Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55" <hector.minero@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:04:09 -0500
To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Conversation: [THIN] Re: DST Patch and Citrix
Subject: [THIN] Re: DST Patch and Citrix
On the same topic, I checked the MS site and there is no DST patch for
Windows 2000, unless you have Extended hotfix support.
What are you doing to patch Windows 2000?
_________________________
Hector Minero
NSWCDD Code K55
Ph: 540.653.8859
Email: hector.minero@xxxxxxxx
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Anthony_Baldwin@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 4:19 PM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: DST Patch and Citrix
>
>
> Chris,
>
> This article mentions how to work around the PS 3.0 java 1.4.1_XX
> dependency...
>
> http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX106292&searchID=38652551
> <http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX106292&searchID=38652551>
>
> Tony
>
>
>
>
> <christopher.walter@xxxxxxx>
> Sent by: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 02/08/2007 04:06 PM
> Please respond to
> thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> To
> <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>
> Subject
> [THIN] DST Patch and Citrix
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I haven¹t had much time to investigate so I am hoping to check with others.
> I am using Presentation Server 3.0. When you install Metaframe it required
> 1.4.1_02. The DST patch apparently is only supported with JRE 1.4.1_11.
> Citrix¹s website says that Citrix is fully compatible with the patch, does
> that mean that Java does or doesn¹t need to be upgraded? If anybody has
> tested this out yet can you let me know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
>
Other related posts:
