Jeff, [As well, windows 2000 terminal services does NOT require a TS license server to be on a domain.] Do you mean that the TS License server doensn't have to be a member of the domain or that a TS License server does not have to be installed on a DC? Regards, Michel. 2006/2/9, Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx>: > > You can have multiple license servers in a windows 2000 domain as well. > You need to use the regkey for pointing the servers to a specific license > server, that's all. It's no big deal. As well, windows 2000 terminal > services does NOT require a TS license server to be on a domain. > > Jeff > > > On 2/9/06, bbeckett2000@xxxxxxxxxxx <bbeckett2000@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So with 2003 this is no longer an issue? (having a dc be the license > > server) > > > > > > -------------- Original message -------------- > > From: "Mike Semon" < msemon@xxxxxxx> > > Oops. thought you had Windows 2003. Should have read entire post. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]*On > > Behalf Of *Mike Semon > > *Sent:* Thursday, February 09, 2006 9:20 AM > > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Concerns > > > > I think you can have both farms in the same Domain and remain separate. > > If I am reading the Terminal Server Licensing doc correctly you can have > > multiple license servers in the same domain. They no longer must be > > installed on Domain Controllers. The Citrix License server I believe can > > support multiple farms. > > > > Mike > > > > -----Original Message----- > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]*On > > Behalf Of *Bill Beckett > > *Sent:* Thursday, February 09, 2006 8:40 AM > > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > *Subject:* [THIN] Concerns > > > > We have a PS 4.0 farm, small 3 server in our domain, abc. Corporate > > wants us to abandon our doman and become an OU in their domain (both domains > > are 2k). However, we want to keep our farms separate (they also have a PS > > 4.0 farm) for reasons that would be long to list here. > > > > So, we give up our domain, hence we give up our DC's. Off the bat, I see > > licensing problems since licensing has to be on a DC and ours get put to > > bed. What other potential issues can you guys see here? > > > > >