[THIN] Re: Citrix Profile Management 4.0
- From: Harry Singh <hboogz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:32:47 -0500
Thanks Joe. That can certainly happen, but what happens when a user logs
into XD then accesses applications which reside on XA? UserA logs into x86
Windows 7 desktop, opens up MS Word sitting on x64 XA server, I believe two
profiles are being created and used simultaneously.
So, if two profiles will be used, how would you properly setup system
variables to accommodate this?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Xd and xa ad object should be in separate OUs. Just set up two GPOs. One
> for each OU. Each GPO points to a different file location.
>
> Joe
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 25, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Harry Singh <hboogz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm having a tough time understanding how to implement UPM 4.0 correctly
> and hoping could help solve this puzzle.
>
> I currently am piloting a XD 5.5 with XA 6.5 deployment. Windows 7
> Professional (x86) desktops with apps hosted on XA 6.5. Now, there will be
> users connecting to desktops on XD and users connecting solely to Apps on
> XA 6.5. I'm not migrating any existing roaming profiles and my confusion
> lies in the following:
>
> 1XD 5.5 server with 2 XA 6.5 servers.
>
> I have my profile store set to \\fileserver\ctxprofiles
>
> Do i need to even worry about setting up a system environment variable on
> the Desktop image and XA servers, such as %profver% If i do, as i suspect
> because of the different bitness between the XD desktop (win 7 x86) and
> servers (XD + XA being x64) what do i need to enter in for profile store
> path ? More importantly, and the area of the most confusion, is what do i
> enter inside the Variable Value, should i have to account for different
> bitness, to make sure each is properly populated in the "v1 aka x86" and
> "v2 aka x64" folders?
>
> I may be over complicating this a bit, but real curious to know how to
> properly setup PM for a Xendesktop environment with XA.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Harry.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
