I'll agree with that. we were solely using it for web based vpn and not the firewall features. but sent it back in the end. On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Evan Mann <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > C'mon now. The ASA is far from a piece of junk. It's a firewall first > and a VPN appliance second. Maybe the VPN features are "junk", but the ASA > is an excellent enterprise class firewall. > > > > > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Greg Reese > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:36 PM > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Cisco / Web Interface Single Signon > > > > Shame you didn't post up before you bought the ASA. We just went through > hell with one of those. What a piece of junk. We ended up ditching it in > favor of the Citrix Secure Gateway. Much easier solution and the price was > even better compared to the ASA > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Angela Smith <angela_smith9@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Hi > > We have just installed a Cisco ASA 5520 VPN appliance with two factor RSA > authentication. We are looking at enabling single signon so users enter AD > username / token password and AD password at VPN login screen. We then want > this information to pass thru the Web Interface so users do not need to > login to AD at the Web Interface screen. Has anyone successfully done this? > > I don't know what I need to setup to get the Web Interface to read the AD > information from the VPN. The default Web Interface authentication options > do not seem to work. Any assistance appreciated. > > Thanks > Angela > ------------------------------ > > Check our comprehensive Salary Centre Overpaid or > Underpaid?<http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fcontent%2Emycareer%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fsalary%2Dcentre%3Fs%5Fcid%3D595810&_t=766724125&_r=Hotmail_Email_Tagline_MyCareer_Oct07&_m=EXT> > > >