[THIN] Re: CSG really necessary?
- From: "Magnus" <magnus@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 14:15:12 -0400
I don't think so. Especially in the set up that you have.
One question though if your Nfuse server is sitting in the DMZ where are
your MF servers?
If they are behind the firewall (not in DMZ) are you only allowing port 80
and 443 traffic to those servers from the Nfuse server and only 1494 traffic
from the internet to those servers?
Magnus
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Scott Reichardt
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 2:05 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] CSG really necessary?
Im using MF XP 1.0. If I have NFUSE 1.7 running on a DMZ using SSL
encryption and everyone connecting to the published apps using secureica RC5
128 bit encryption, is a Citrix Secure Gateway really necessary? I'd rather
not have to dedicate another box for a CSG if everything is already getting
encrypted.
********************************************************
This Week's Sponsor - Emergent Online
EOL's Universal Printer new Features include:
Network Printing, Pagestreaming, 2400 DPI.
No Client Software Required!
http://www.go-eol.com/
**********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
********************************************************
This Week's Sponsor - Emergent Online
EOL's Universal Printer new Features include:
Network Printing, Pagestreaming, 2400 DPI.
No Client Software Required!
http://www.go-eol.com/
**********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
Other related posts:
