[THIN] Re: Buh-By Presentation Server...Hello XenApp Server
- From: "Chad Schneider (IT)" <Chad.M.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:00:06 -0600
The change of colors on their promotions, web page, etc., was a sign of things
to come.
>>> On 1/30/2008 at 12:36 PM, <WBECKETT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Will they have a new symbol, like a guy with legs crossed and hands in prayer
form?
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Chad Schneider (IT)
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 12:19 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Buh-By Presentation Server...Hello XenApp Server
I see them encompassing their virtual environments, by further expanding the
Xen name.
>>> On 1/30/2008 at 11:09 AM, <Neil.Braebaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Indeed.
And as much as I dislike all the form over function marketeering, it's
not as if it's totally unexpected, is it.
I mean, how many name changes had occurred before it was called
Presentation Server?
Eventually it'll come full circle, and be called Winframe ;-) (and yes,
I'm kinda glossing over the first product they had, because it's not
really the same...)
Neil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chad Schneider (IT)
> Sent: 30 January 2008 17:04
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Buh-By Presentation Server...Hello XenApp Server
>
> Citrix XenApp Server
>
> It is still a Citrix product.
>
> >>> On 1/30/2008 at 10:46 AM, <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> XenApp Server. don't forget the server, very important. We
> wouldn't want to get it confused with a workstation or something.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Beckett, William (Bill)
> <WBECKETT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> XenApp? OMG
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jan
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:08 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Buh-By Presentation Server...Hello
> XenApp Server
>
>
> Why??? Citrix, read my message... this is STOOPID! Keep
> the same name.
>
>
> On Jan 29, 2008 4:27 PM, Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Just curious what everyone thinks of yet
> ANOTHER name change by Citrix of their flagship product.
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
*****************************************************************************
This email and its attachments are confidential and are intended for the above
named recipient only. If this has come to you in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete this email from your system. You must take no
action based on this, nor must you copy or disclose it or any part of its
contents to any person or organisation. Statements and opinions contained in
this email may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods Shop Direct Group
Limited or its subsidiaries. Please note that email communications may be
monitored. The registered office of Littlewoods Shop Direct Group Limited is
1st Floor, Skyways House, Speke Road, Speke, Liverpool, L70 1AB, registered
number 5059352
*****************************************************************************
This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl -
www.blackspider.com
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
Other related posts:
