[THIN] Re: Bottlenecks (was RE: Re: OT: Dell PE 1855 Blade Servers)
- From: Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:02:40 -0700
Are they are IBMs?
Joe
On 1/27/06, Michel Roth <mrdizzz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> But then again there's nothing like digging into performanceproblems for
> 92 hours straight and finding nothing ... ;-)
>
> 2006/1/27, Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx >:
> >
> > I believe that Lakeside software would help as well.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> > On 1/27/06, Michel Roth <mrdizzz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Also there's (expensive) software out there that implies that hey can
> > > pinpoint a bottleneck for you. Here are some
> > >
> > > Reflectant EdgeSight for Citrix:
> > > http://www.reflectent.com/edge/citrix.aspx
> > >
> > > RTO pinpoint: http://www.rtosoft.com/products/PinPoint/about.html
> > > eG Citrix Monitor: http://www.eginnovations.com/web/egcitrix.htm
> > >
> > >
> > > 2006/1/26, Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > >
> > > > Brian Madden has several articles on his website as well as his book
> > > > for TS 2003 (now downloadable) has information on this subject.
> > > >
> > > > Jeff Pitsch
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/26/06, Mark Mucher <mmucher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This discussion raises the question of the best way to ID a
> > > > > bottleneck.
> > > > >
> > > > > Are there any quick and easy utils available, or do we still have
> > > > > to do it
> > > > > the old fashion way?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Mark
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ]
> > > > > On Behalf
> > > > > Of Braebaum, Neil
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 10:36 AM
> > > > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: Dell PE 1855 Blade Servers
> > > > >
> > > > > Agreed - but in fairness I haven't seen anybody in this discussion
> > > > >
> > > > > suggesting that such concepts are any panacea.
> > > > >
> > > > > BUT - if there's a reasonable market for products optimising
> > > > > memory -
> > > > > especially WRT paging, for the TS / Citrix server market, it's a
> > > > > reasonable
> > > > > assumption that it's a worthy goal.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, that doesn't necessarily mean that a) every / most / many
> > > > > admins
> > > > > will encounter it b) that every approach to it is relatively equal
> > > > > on merit
> > > > > c) that even attempting to address, or perhaps even sorting it
> > > > > out, won't
> > > > > merely shift the problem elsewhere.
> > > > >
> > > > > I was merely pointing out, that (from a slightly over-simplified
> > > > > perspective) the rationale or motivation behind memory
> > > > > optimisation
> > > > > products, and solid state pagefile devices, is rather connected.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, I didn't imply or believe that both approaches are equal
> > > > > in merit,
> > > > > value or results.
> > > > >
> > > > > Neil
> > > > >
> > > > > ************************************************
> > > > > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> > > > > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> > > > > //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> > > > > ************************************************
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Other related posts:
