[THIN] Re: Bandwidth Question
- From: "Eilers, Lee \(CDC/OCOO/ITSO\) \(CTR\)" <lee4@xxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 13:45:12 -0400
Just created a new Citrix policy and chose the option to optimize for a
dial-up connection. I then went it and turned off more items. Will
test and see how it goes.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Eilers, Lee (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:13 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Bandwidth Question
Just short of doing this on a global basis, not a good option for us, I
think I read in CPS 4.0 that I could do this via Citrix policies (but I
am still on v3.0 of presentation server.
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Philip Walley
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:06 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Bandwidth Question
I would think that a packeteer box in conjunction to turning off as many
of the virtual channels as possible would get you within reasonable
numbers.
Joe LaRocca wrote:
> Satellite is a very bad option. We did extensive testing over
> satellite and the latency was just too great for a good terminal
> server (or
> Citrix) session.
>
>
>
> Joe LaRocca
>
> Senior Network Engineer
>
> 501.562.6800 Ext. 204
>
> fax 501.562.7111
>
> Joe_LaRocca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Confidential, unpublished property of Interface Healthcare Information
> Systems, LLC copyright as of the date of this email.
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments
> and files transmitted with it, are confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential
> and exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. Moreover, this
> communication may contain the original sender's personal views and
> opinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of Interface
> Healthcare Information Systems, LLC. If you are not the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient
> or if you have received this communication in error, please notify us
> immediately by return e-mail and delete the original message and any
copies of it from your system.
> If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have
> received this e-mail in error, and that any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure, distribution, forwarding, printing, or copying of this
> e-mail is strictly prohibited without our prior, written permission
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of msemon@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 11:35 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Bandwidth Question
>
> Is a satellite solution a possiblility?
>
> Mike
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Taylor, George gtaylor@xxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 10:04:21 -0600
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Bandwidth Question
>
>
> wow, and being CDC you are the guys that really need communications.
>
> Just some thoughts:
>
> Enable SpeedScreen
> Lower both your resolution and color depth Disable audio Disable port
> mapping If they don't need to print, disable printing.
> Maybe look into a packeteer type unit for your home site.
>
>
> George Taylor
> Systems Programmer
> Regional Health Inc.
>
> _____
>
> From: Eilers, Lee (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR) [mailto:lee4@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 8:12 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Bandwidth Question
>
>
> We have users in "undeveloped" countries, where telecommunication
> systems are questionable at best, that connect at dial-up speeds in
> the 15k to 20k range. These users connecting to our Citrix
> environment complain that our "system is useless" :-p
>
> it is my experience and opinion that you need at least 20k for Citrix,
> ideally 26K.
>
>
> Is there "any" ideas on how to handle these users over a crappy
> connection?
> ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any
> attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from
> disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
> message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> please notify the Sender immediately by a "reply to sender only"
> message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the
> communication, including any attachments.
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
>
>
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation
> mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> ************************************************
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation
> mode use the below link:
> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> ************************************************
>
>
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation
mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation
mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
Other related posts:
