[THIN] Re: Appsense personalisation

  • From: Mark Schill <Meson3902@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:47:15 -0500

There are of course differences that you have to adjust for, but in general
we have never had any issues going back and forth between XP/2003 and
7/2008 in our environment. AppSense is a great product for controlling the
user's settings. The biggest issue to overcome is the fact that the
application's settings are virtualized as well. This is great for allowing
you to operate various versions of products. But when you need different
products to use each other's settings then you have to do some work to get
them configured.



On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There is always a Microsoft profile no matter how you slice it.  AppSense
> gives you better control over the user’s environment and application
> preferences.****
>
> ** **
>
> Portability is another subject.  Many of these venders sell their product
> as allowing apps to be “OS” independent.  It doesn’t’ work quite the way
> it’s sold.  Think of it as a migration tool and not an interoperability
> tool.  You can go from XP to Win7, but going back is much more difficult.
> Win7 x86 to Windows 2008 R2?  You’ll have bit level issues to deal with.**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> Joe****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *James Scanlon
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 19, 2011 4:59 AM
>
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Appsense personalisation****
>
> ** **
>
> The removal of windows profiles entirely****
>
> The ability to have the settings portable across different OS's (server
> 2008, 2003 and win7)****
>
>  ****
>
> Thats it.... for now...:)****
>
> ** **
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Andrew Wood
> *Sent:* 19 November 2011 11:15
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Appsense personalisation****
>
> The first question you need to ask is what are you hoping to achieve..
> lets work from there up.****
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *scanjam@xxxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* 18 November 2011 13:50
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Appsense personalisation****
>
> Any suggestions here? For's or against's?? Alternatives? We are looking to
> deploy at some stage in new year.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Sent from my HTC****
>
> *______________________________________*****
>
>  ****
>
> C. Hoare & Co. is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority with registration no. 122093. The FSA’s address is 25, The North
> Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5HS.****
>
> Registered in England no. 240822. Registered office 37 Fleet St, London,
> EC4P 4DQ****
>
>  ****
>
> Confidentiality Disclaimer:****
>
> This message and attachments are confidential and may be privileged, and
> are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s). If you are not the
> intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this document is
> unauthorised. Information transmitted by email may be intercepted, lost,
> destroyed, corrupted or delayed and as a result, C. Hoare & Co. do not
> accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
> message. If you would like to confirm the contents of this email, please
> request a hard copy version.****
>
>  ****
>
> If the contents of this message are of a personal nature, the email will
> have been sent in a personal capacity and not on behalf of C. Hoare & Co.*
> ***
>
>  ****
>
> Monitoring/Viruses:****
>
> C. Hoare & Co. may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with
> current legislation. Although emails are screened for viruses, C. Hoare &
> Co. cannot guarantee that any transmissions will be virus free.****
>
> *__**______________________________________*****
>
> * *****
>

Other related posts: