[THIN] Re: Anti Virus
- From: "Stefan Timmermans" <stefan.timmermans@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:19:51 +0100
Not quite (.about usefulness..) as the test conducted measures the removal
capabilities but not the real time
scanning and virus prevention capabilities nor the response time against new
threats of the particular vendor.
To me these are a 3rd and 4th relavant items necessary to make a final
judgement.
A possible 5th would be the taxation of your system in terms of non-paged
pool , memory and CPU to scan your system
Weekly. How long does it take to scan a disk of 500GB for example ?
As an administrator, I'm concerned about the response of the vendor if there
is a major outbreak
and if on heaviliy used systems (like a corporate DFS server, or Profile
Servers) the scanengine is not
throwing up issues.
Nevertheless I did not feel bored reading , far from that , 2 very important
aspects are measured, so we could eliminate
some of them with ease.
Stefan
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Tig Aga
Sent: vrijdag 20 november 2009 12:49
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Anti Virus
Top Anti-Virus Software Tested, Some OK, Others Useless --
<http://www.ezdia.com/top_antivirus_tested%252C_some_useful_other_useless_/C
ontent.do?id=943>
http://www.ezdia.com/top_antivirus_tested%252C_some_useful_other_useless_/Co
ntent.do?id=943
Other related posts:
