[THIN] Re: Access Gateway 5.0 VPX PNAgent

From: "Mark Oliver" <Mark.Oliver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:49:38 +1300
Couldn't agree more Jim

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Jim Kenzig
Sent: Thursday, 2 December 2010 1:36 a.m.
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 5.0 VPX PNAgent

<Rant On>
You know it never ceases to amaze me with these companies nowadays. It isn't 
just Citrix.

Put out a new product but take away key features that people have been using 
that they really need. (you know like actually working at all)

The fact that it is Citrix's own products not working together is a real shame. 
 I know software changes can break things but ...basic connectivity? What 
happened to quality control?

Backwards compatibility is a necessity in this day and age and I am really 
getting tired of companies forcing upgrades for the sake of adding just plain 
functionality because they have a new client or OS that has a few more bells 
and whistles. If you upgrade one component it breaks functionality and you end 
up upgrading or having to update 3 more.
And then try and find where it is buried in the documentation where it tells 
you to do that is another story. It is madness.
<Rant off>
Job security I guess.
Regards
Jim Kenzig
http://www.kenzig.com<http://www.kenzig.com/>


On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Rota, Brian 
<brota@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brota@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Stay with version 4.6 for now 5.0 does not work.
My problem was the customer wanted to put it on vmware but 4.6 did not support 
esx
Brian

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf 
Of Jason Benway
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:47 PM

To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 5.0 VPX PNAgent

I'm looking to do something similar. So what was Citrix solution? I thought 
that's what the VPX was for, to have Ipad's, etc connecting to it?

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf 
Of Rota, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:22 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 5.0 VPX PNAgent

Citrix is telling me it wont work and neither does IPADs with version 5 of the 
cag.
Thanks for your help today.
Brian

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf 
Of Rota, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:05 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 5.0 VPX PNAgent

I think you may be on to something.
Web Interface works with Windows but MACs are getting a ssl error so I am going 
to try and redo the certs.

Brian

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf 
Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:41 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 5.0 VPX PNAgent

So the second one points to Certificate issues.  If we go that route, I am 
assuming since your CAG is working with WI that it has the certificate 
installed. Have you assured that the client device you are trying to connect 
with has the cert on it?
If it is not google the keywords: install wi certificate on CAG

For mobile android clients I had to use Firefox and save the certificate from 
the site as a crt file and then I texted it to the devices so they could click 
on it and install it.
Jim Kenzig
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Rota, Brian 
<brota@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brota@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Here is what I am seeing.

http://forums.citrix.com/thread.jspa?threadID=277517&tstart=15

http://forums.citrix.com/thread.jspa?threadID=276719&tstart=15

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf 
Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:30 AM

To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 5.0 VPX PNAgent

Can you try the IP??
Jim Kenzig
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Rota, Brian 
<brota@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brota@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi Jim,
Yes I have a separate site that is configured for the PNagent.
It is Web Interface 5.3 and the CAG 5.0 VPX
XenAPP 5 farm.

I am thinking the issue is the new way the cag redirects the url.

Brian

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf 
Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:11 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 5.0 VPX PNAgent

So you already have created a separate new service site for the PNAgent in the 
Access Managmenent console?  If not you must create the PNagent service.

What version of WI is it?  Scott McDonalds tip here in this thread got 
connectivity to my WI PNagent up and working by just adding the 2 lines to my 
web config file. http://forums.citrix.com/thread.jspa?messageID=1465934

I don't know if it fits your situation though.
Jim Kenzig
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Rota, Brian 
<brota@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brota@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Hello

I am trying to configure Cag 5.0 to access the services site with the online 
plug in.

So far I am not able to access the site.

My web interface is configured to use the Web Interface for authentication and 
works fine.

Can anyone offer any help?





Thank you

Brian





Mgate3.telecom.co.nz made the following annotations
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, 
destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose 
anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not 
designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions 
Act 2002.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
References:
- [THIN] Re: Access Gateway 5.0 VPX PNAgent
  - From: Jim Kenzig
[THIN] Re: Access Gateway 5.0 VPX PNAgent

Other related posts:
